The natural history of musical rhythm: functional and mechanistic theories on the evolution of human rhythm cognition and the relevance of rhythmic animal behaviors

Gabriela-Alina Sauciuc, Tomas Persson, E. Madsen
{"title":"The natural history of musical rhythm: functional and mechanistic theories on the evolution of human rhythm cognition and the relevance of rhythmic animal behaviors","authors":"Gabriela-Alina Sauciuc, Tomas Persson, E. Madsen","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/3v4dr","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has recently been a growing interest to investigate rhythm cognition in nonhuman animals as a way of tracking the evolutionary origins of human musicality - i.e., the ability to perceive, enjoy and produce music. During the last two decades, there has been an explosion of theoretical proposals aimed at explaining why and how humans have evolved into musical beings, and the empirical comparative research has also gained momentum. In this paper, we focus on the rhythmic component of musicality, and review functional and mechanistic theoretical proposals on abilities regarded as prerequisites for perceiving and producing rhythmic structures similar to those encountered in music. For each theoretical proposal we also review supporting and contradictory empirical findings. To acknowledge that the evolutionary study of musicality requires an interdisciplinary approach, our review strives to cover perspectives and findings from as many disciplines as possible. We conclude with a research agenda that highlights relevant, yet thus far neglected topics in the comparative and evolutionary study of rhythm cognition. Specifically, we call for a widened research focus that will include additional rhythmic abilities besides entrainment, additional channels of perception and production besides the auditory and vocal ones, and a systematic focus on the functional contexts in which rhythmic signals spontaneously occur. With this expanded focus, and drawing from systematic observation and experimentation anchored in multiple disciplines, animal research is bound to generate many important insights into the adaptive pressures that forged the component abilities of human rhythm cognition and their (socio-)cognitive and (neuro-)biological underpinnings.","PeriodicalId":422333,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/3v4dr","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There has recently been a growing interest to investigate rhythm cognition in nonhuman animals as a way of tracking the evolutionary origins of human musicality - i.e., the ability to perceive, enjoy and produce music. During the last two decades, there has been an explosion of theoretical proposals aimed at explaining why and how humans have evolved into musical beings, and the empirical comparative research has also gained momentum. In this paper, we focus on the rhythmic component of musicality, and review functional and mechanistic theoretical proposals on abilities regarded as prerequisites for perceiving and producing rhythmic structures similar to those encountered in music. For each theoretical proposal we also review supporting and contradictory empirical findings. To acknowledge that the evolutionary study of musicality requires an interdisciplinary approach, our review strives to cover perspectives and findings from as many disciplines as possible. We conclude with a research agenda that highlights relevant, yet thus far neglected topics in the comparative and evolutionary study of rhythm cognition. Specifically, we call for a widened research focus that will include additional rhythmic abilities besides entrainment, additional channels of perception and production besides the auditory and vocal ones, and a systematic focus on the functional contexts in which rhythmic signals spontaneously occur. With this expanded focus, and drawing from systematic observation and experimentation anchored in multiple disciplines, animal research is bound to generate many important insights into the adaptive pressures that forged the component abilities of human rhythm cognition and their (socio-)cognitive and (neuro-)biological underpinnings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
音乐节奏的自然史:人类节奏认知进化的功能和机制理论与有节奏动物行为的相关性
最近,人们对研究非人类动物的节奏认知越来越感兴趣,这是一种追踪人类音乐性进化起源的方式——即感知、享受和创作音乐的能力。在过去的二十年里,有大量的理论建议旨在解释人类为什么以及如何进化成音乐生物,实证比较研究也获得了动力。在本文中,我们关注音乐性的节奏成分,并回顾了功能和机制的理论建议,这些能力被认为是感知和产生类似于音乐中遇到的节奏结构的先决条件。对于每一个理论建议,我们也回顾了支持和矛盾的实证结果。为了承认音乐性的进化研究需要跨学科的方法,我们的综述努力涵盖尽可能多的学科的观点和发现。我们总结了一个研究议程,强调了节奏认知的比较和进化研究中相关但迄今为止被忽视的主题。具体来说,我们呼吁扩大研究重点,包括除了娱乐之外的其他节奏能力,除了听觉和声乐之外的其他感知和产生渠道,以及系统地关注节奏信号自发发生的功能背景。有了这个扩展的焦点,并从多学科的系统观察和实验中提取,动物研究必然会产生许多重要的见解,以适应压力,锻造人类节奏认知的组成能力及其(社会)认知和(神经)生物学基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The natural history of musical rhythm: functional and mechanistic theories on the evolution of human rhythm cognition and the relevance of rhythmic animal behaviors A social history of the founding of the Conference on Comparative Cognition and the Comparative Cognition Society Comparative Approaches to the Natural Ecology of Metacognition Snakes: Slithering from Sensory Physiology to Cognition The Importance of Reproductive Behavior Tests in Bull Breeding Soundness Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1