Perception Teachers Civics the Implementation of the Curriculum

Liam Elijah
{"title":"Perception Teachers Civics the Implementation of the Curriculum","authors":"Liam Elijah","doi":"10.46532/JIEE.20200905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to: (1) describe the Civics teachers' perception of implementation of the curriculum 2013, (2) knowing the obstacles faced by teachers, (3) knowing the efforts of teachers to overcome obstacles and (4) knowing the opinions of Civics teachers for future improvement. The study population was all Civic Education teachers in State Junior High Schools in Samarinda City and the sample was target teachers who had trained and implemented the 2013 Curriculum. The sampling technique was purposive sampling. Data collection techniques: focused group discussion (FGD), interviews and questionnaires. The data analysis technique uses the percentage model while the measurement uses a modified Likert scale. The results showed: (1) the perception of Civics teachers in the implementation of the 2013 curriculum was quite poor because most teachers still had difficulty in implementing the 2013 curriculum; (2) obstacles faced: (a) the teacher has difficulty in determining the media in accordance with teaching and learning activities; (b) teachers find it difficult to implement project-based, problem-based and discovery-based learning methods due to time and cost constraints and lack of supporting facilities and infrastructure; (c) the recapitulation assessment is difficult every day because it is less specific. (3) Teachers' efforts to overcome obstacles: discussion among teachers ask the 2013 Curriculum instructors find the latest information through the internet and new published books, take part in training and carry out gradual assessments according to the teacher's understanding. (4) Civics teacher opinions for future improvement: the need for regular and continuous education and training, simplified assessment process, adequate facilities and infrastructure, reactivating MGMP (Subject Teachers' Consultation), continuous monitoring and evaluation after the Training is completed.","PeriodicalId":263238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovations in Engineering Education","volume":"161 10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovations in Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46532/JIEE.20200905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to: (1) describe the Civics teachers' perception of implementation of the curriculum 2013, (2) knowing the obstacles faced by teachers, (3) knowing the efforts of teachers to overcome obstacles and (4) knowing the opinions of Civics teachers for future improvement. The study population was all Civic Education teachers in State Junior High Schools in Samarinda City and the sample was target teachers who had trained and implemented the 2013 Curriculum. The sampling technique was purposive sampling. Data collection techniques: focused group discussion (FGD), interviews and questionnaires. The data analysis technique uses the percentage model while the measurement uses a modified Likert scale. The results showed: (1) the perception of Civics teachers in the implementation of the 2013 curriculum was quite poor because most teachers still had difficulty in implementing the 2013 curriculum; (2) obstacles faced: (a) the teacher has difficulty in determining the media in accordance with teaching and learning activities; (b) teachers find it difficult to implement project-based, problem-based and discovery-based learning methods due to time and cost constraints and lack of supporting facilities and infrastructure; (c) the recapitulation assessment is difficult every day because it is less specific. (3) Teachers' efforts to overcome obstacles: discussion among teachers ask the 2013 Curriculum instructors find the latest information through the internet and new published books, take part in training and carry out gradual assessments according to the teacher's understanding. (4) Civics teacher opinions for future improvement: the need for regular and continuous education and training, simplified assessment process, adequate facilities and infrastructure, reactivating MGMP (Subject Teachers' Consultation), continuous monitoring and evaluation after the Training is completed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感知教师公民课程的实施
本研究旨在:(1)描述公民学教师对2013年课程实施的感知;(2)了解教师面临的障碍;(3)了解教师为克服障碍所做的努力;(4)了解公民学教师对未来改进的意见。研究人群为Samarinda市所有州立初中公民教育教师,样本为已培训并实施2013年课程的目标教师。抽样方法为有目的抽样。数据收集技术:焦点小组讨论(FGD),访谈和问卷调查。数据分析技术使用百分比模型,而测量使用修改的李克特量表。结果表明:(1)公民学教师对2013年课程实施的感知较差,大部分教师对2013年课程实施仍有困难;(2)面临的障碍:(a)教师难以根据教与学活动确定媒介;(b)由于时间和成本限制以及缺乏配套设施和基础设施,教师发现难以实施基于项目、基于问题和基于发现的学习方法;(c)重述评估每天都很困难,因为它不太具体。(3)教师克服障碍的努力:教师之间的讨论要求2013年课程讲师通过互联网和新出版的书籍查找最新信息,参加培训,并根据教师的理解进行逐步评估。(4)公民教师对未来改进的意见:需要定期和持续的教育和培训,简化评估流程,充足的设施和基础设施,重新启动MGMP(学科教师咨询),培训结束后持续监测和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of plastic pyrolysis oil and its blends with diesel on Cetane Index The effect of waste electronic plastics and waste marble dust as a partial aggregate replacement on concrete SVM, KNN, Random Forest, and Neural Network based Handwritten Nepali Barnamala Recognition Sustainable energy planning of residential sector: A case study of Bhanu municipality National Customs and Traditions in the Educational Process for Primary School Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1