Community Based Forest Management License: The Urgency of Forest Management for Human Development in Indigenous Peoples

Hafsah Aryandini, Abel Parvez
{"title":"Community Based Forest Management License: The Urgency of Forest Management for Human Development in Indigenous Peoples","authors":"Hafsah Aryandini, Abel Parvez","doi":"10.35586/velrev.v6i1.4686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The position of customary law communities ' property rights (MHA) over customary forests has not been fully protected by law which causes conflicts regarding customary forests. Weak legal protection leads to discrimination for MHA, namely by loss of residence, loss of agricultural land, and even leading to punishment for defending its rights. In fact, the existence of Indigenous Peoples has been guaranteed in the constitution, namely in Article 18B of the 1945 NRI Constitution. However, in reality, the problem of property rights to customary forests is still often encountered and even boils down to human rights violations, namely the criminalization of Indigenous Peoples who are fighting for their rights. The postulate gives rise to two formulations of the problem. First, what are the problems with forest management regulation on the protection and empowerment of Indigenous Peoples? Second, How is the concept of forest management that protects and empowers Indigenous Peoples in accordance with the ius constituendum? To answer this problem, the author recommends improvements related to existing arrangements and the establishment of government policies as a concrete effort in enforcing the rights of MHA.  Existing laws must provide protection and protection of the human rights of indigenous peoples and be accompanied by customary forest management based on the Community Based Forest Management (CBFM) License as a mechanism in settlement and to protect and implement MHA.","PeriodicalId":165691,"journal":{"name":"Veteran Law Review","volume":"146 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veteran Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v6i1.4686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The position of customary law communities ' property rights (MHA) over customary forests has not been fully protected by law which causes conflicts regarding customary forests. Weak legal protection leads to discrimination for MHA, namely by loss of residence, loss of agricultural land, and even leading to punishment for defending its rights. In fact, the existence of Indigenous Peoples has been guaranteed in the constitution, namely in Article 18B of the 1945 NRI Constitution. However, in reality, the problem of property rights to customary forests is still often encountered and even boils down to human rights violations, namely the criminalization of Indigenous Peoples who are fighting for their rights. The postulate gives rise to two formulations of the problem. First, what are the problems with forest management regulation on the protection and empowerment of Indigenous Peoples? Second, How is the concept of forest management that protects and empowers Indigenous Peoples in accordance with the ius constituendum? To answer this problem, the author recommends improvements related to existing arrangements and the establishment of government policies as a concrete effort in enforcing the rights of MHA.  Existing laws must provide protection and protection of the human rights of indigenous peoples and be accompanied by customary forest management based on the Community Based Forest Management (CBFM) License as a mechanism in settlement and to protect and implement MHA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于社区的森林经营许可证:森林管理对土著人民人类发展的紧迫性
习惯法共同体对习惯森林的产权地位没有得到法律的充分保护,导致了有关习惯森林的冲突。法律保护的薄弱导致MHA受到歧视,即失去居住权,失去农地,甚至因维护其权利而受到惩罚。事实上,土著人民的存在已在宪法中得到保障,即在1945年的NRI宪法第18条b款中。然而,在现实中,习惯森林的财产权问题仍然经常遇到,甚至归结为侵犯人权,即对争取其权利的土著人民定罪。这个公设引出了这个问题的两种表述。首先,森林管理条例在保护和赋予土著人民权力方面存在什么问题?第二,保护和赋予土著人民权力的森林管理概念如何符合宪法?为了回答这一问题,作者建议改进现有安排,并制定政府政策,作为执行MHA权利的具体努力。现有法律必须保护和保护土著人民的人权,并辅以以社区森林管理许可证为基础的习惯森林管理,作为解决和保护和执行森林资源管理的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Criminal Law Approach to Absentee Land Ownership as A Form of Legal Protection by The State Amicus Curiae: Position and Role in Issuing Decisions by Judges as an Effort to Achieve Substantive Justice Corporate Crime in Smuggling Illegal Foreign Workers in Indonesia PENANGGULANGAN TINDAK PIDANA YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH WANITA DALAM PEREDARAN NARKOTIKA PENEGAKAN HUKUM LALU LINTAS JALAN SECARA ELEKTRONIK SEBAGAI WUJUD PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM WILAYAH HUKUM JAKARTA SELATAN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1