On the Empiricism of Logical Empiricism

T. Uebel
{"title":"On the Empiricism of Logical Empiricism","authors":"T. Uebel","doi":"10.23925/2764-0892.2021.v1.n1.e55724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nThis paper warns against misunderstanding the logical empiricists’ take on the concepts of experience and empiricism. Far from expressing traditionalist way-of-ideas conceptions, these concepts were themselves rethought and refashioned to accord with their overall aim of making contemporary philosophy of science fit for purpose. To this end, this paper disarms the supposed counter-examples of Schlick’s foundationalism and Carnap’s Aufbau and exemplifies the aimed for understanding by examples of the physialist theorising of Carnap and Neurath. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":105071,"journal":{"name":"Geltung - Revista de Estudos das Origens da Filosofia Contemporânea","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geltung - Revista de Estudos das Origens da Filosofia Contemporânea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23925/2764-0892.2021.v1.n1.e55724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper warns against misunderstanding the logical empiricists’ take on the concepts of experience and empiricism. Far from expressing traditionalist way-of-ideas conceptions, these concepts were themselves rethought and refashioned to accord with their overall aim of making contemporary philosophy of science fit for purpose. To this end, this paper disarms the supposed counter-examples of Schlick’s foundationalism and Carnap’s Aufbau and exemplifies the aimed for understanding by examples of the physialist theorising of Carnap and Neurath.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论逻辑经验主义的经验主义
本文警告人们不要误解逻辑经验主义者对经验和经验主义概念的理解。这些概念本身并没有表达传统主义的观念方式,而是被重新思考和改造,以符合其使当代科学哲学符合目的的总体目标。为此,本文解除了施里克的基础主义和卡尔纳普的Aufbau的所谓反例,并以卡尔纳普和纽拉特的物理主义理论为例,举例说明了理解的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Future of Philosophy The reflexive ceiling of philosophical semantics: struggle for Existence and the Ideal Review - GABRIEL, Gottfried. Kant: Eine kurze Einführung in das Gesamtwerk. Paderborn: Brill Schöningh, 2022. 144 p. Review - RICKERT, Heinrich: Los Dos Caminos De La Teoría Del Conocimiento Y Otros Ensayos. Edición De Stefano Cazzanelli Y Miguel Martí Sánchez. Editorial Comares: Granada, 2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1