The Evolution of Motivation and Incentive Systems Research: A Literature Review

S. Hilmarsson, Páll Rikhardsson
{"title":"The Evolution of Motivation and Incentive Systems Research: A Literature Review","authors":"S. Hilmarsson, Páll Rikhardsson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1965646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theories on incentive systems and motivation have changed dramatically since the turn of the twentieth century. They started out by viewing the worker as inherently lazy and opposing work which gave birth to piece-rate and cash-bonus systems. Around mid-century, scholars adopt a different view, in which the worker is seen as having different and more complex needs than just money. They find that workers want interesting projects, recognition by co-workers and superiors, and to grow, both in the job and as a person. Cash bonus systems are found to be harmful if improperly organized. Intrinsic motivators are shown to be superior to extrinsic ones and more valued and managers are encouraged to adopt incentive systems that take such motivators into account. Incentive systems can have a big impact on the successful adoption of strategy and a link has been found between the two. The future of this type of research lies within exploring non-monetary rewards in various contexts, designing alternative incentive systems and researching their applicability in business as well as linking application of incentive systems to the evolving research agenda in business research.","PeriodicalId":438029,"journal":{"name":"ORG: Motivational Theories (Topic)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORG: Motivational Theories (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1965646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Theories on incentive systems and motivation have changed dramatically since the turn of the twentieth century. They started out by viewing the worker as inherently lazy and opposing work which gave birth to piece-rate and cash-bonus systems. Around mid-century, scholars adopt a different view, in which the worker is seen as having different and more complex needs than just money. They find that workers want interesting projects, recognition by co-workers and superiors, and to grow, both in the job and as a person. Cash bonus systems are found to be harmful if improperly organized. Intrinsic motivators are shown to be superior to extrinsic ones and more valued and managers are encouraged to adopt incentive systems that take such motivators into account. Incentive systems can have a big impact on the successful adoption of strategy and a link has been found between the two. The future of this type of research lies within exploring non-monetary rewards in various contexts, designing alternative incentive systems and researching their applicability in business as well as linking application of incentive systems to the evolving research agenda in business research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动机与激励制度研究的演变:文献综述
自20世纪初以来,关于激励制度和动机的理论发生了巨大的变化。一开始,他们认为工人天生懒惰,反对工作,这催生了计件工资和现金奖金制度。大约在本世纪中叶,学者们采用了一种不同的观点,在这种观点中,工人被视为有不同的、更复杂的需求,而不仅仅是钱。他们发现,员工想要有趣的项目,得到同事和上级的认可,并在工作和个人方面都有所成长。如果组织不当,现金奖励制度被发现是有害的。研究表明,内在激励因素优于外在激励因素,更受重视,并鼓励管理者采用考虑到这些激励因素的激励制度。激励制度可以对战略的成功采用产生重大影响,并且已经发现两者之间存在联系。这类研究的未来在于探索各种背景下的非货币性奖励,设计替代激励制度并研究其在商业中的适用性,以及将激励制度的应用与商业研究中不断发展的研究议程联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transactional Leadership Behaviour and Workers Emotional Labour in Nigerian Hospitality Industry If You Want My Advice: Status Motives and Audit Consultations About Accounting Estimates The Evolution of Motivation and Incentive Systems Research: A Literature Review Incentives and the Sorting of Altruistic Agents into Street-Level Bureaucracies Collusion and Strategic Favoritism in Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1