Moses and the Levites

T. J. Meek
{"title":"Moses and the Levites","authors":"T. J. Meek","doi":"10.1086/370531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper has been prompted by two recent articles bearing on the Levites by Professor Leroy Waterman: \"Some Determining Factors in the Northward Progress of Levi\"' and \"Jacob the Forgotten Supplanter.\"2 The latter article is particularly suggestive, and it is striking in how many points it agrees with conclusions in the present writer's Hebrew Origins (Harpers, 1936), although each was produced quite independently of the other. In fact, the two agree so largely that I would fain adopt all of Waterman's interpretations, particularly those with regard to the Levites. It would make my contention that Yahweh came to the Hebrews through the medium of the tribe of Judah ever so much easier to hold if it could be shown that Moses was not a Levite and that the Levites were never in Egypt. However, the evidences would seem to run so strongly counter to this contention of Waterman that I am forced most reluctantly to reject it. The purpose of this paper is to examine and appraise those evidences.","PeriodicalId":252942,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures","volume":"44 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1939-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/370531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

This paper has been prompted by two recent articles bearing on the Levites by Professor Leroy Waterman: "Some Determining Factors in the Northward Progress of Levi"' and "Jacob the Forgotten Supplanter."2 The latter article is particularly suggestive, and it is striking in how many points it agrees with conclusions in the present writer's Hebrew Origins (Harpers, 1936), although each was produced quite independently of the other. In fact, the two agree so largely that I would fain adopt all of Waterman's interpretations, particularly those with regard to the Levites. It would make my contention that Yahweh came to the Hebrews through the medium of the tribe of Judah ever so much easier to hold if it could be shown that Moses was not a Levite and that the Levites were never in Egypt. However, the evidences would seem to run so strongly counter to this contention of Waterman that I am forced most reluctantly to reject it. The purpose of this paper is to examine and appraise those evidences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摩西和利未人
沃特曼教授最近发表了两篇关于利未人的文章,《利未人向北发展的一些决定因素》和《被遗忘的取代者雅各》,这两篇文章促使了本文的撰写。后一篇文章特别具有启发性,令人惊讶的是,它与作者的《希伯来起源》(Harpers, 1936)的结论在很多方面都是一致的,尽管这两篇文章都是相互独立的。事实上,这两个人在很大程度上是一致的,所以我愿意采纳沃特曼的所有解释,尤其是那些关于利未人的解释。如果能证明摩西不是利未人,利未人从未到过埃及,我的论点——耶和华通过犹大支派的媒介来到希伯来人那里——就会更容易站得住。然而,这些证据似乎与沃特曼的论点截然相反,我不得不极不情愿地拒绝它。本文的目的就是对这些证据进行检验和评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Darius and His Egyptian Campaign Book Review:The Prophets and Their Times J. M. Powis Smith, William A. Irwin The Oriental Institute Archeological Report on the near East, 1941 The Old Aramaic Alphabet at Tell Halaf the Date of the "Altar" Inscription Hurrian Consonantal Pattern
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1