On the evidential value of fingerprints

Hee-seung Choi, Abhishek Nagar, Anil K. Jain
{"title":"On the evidential value of fingerprints","authors":"Hee-seung Choi, Abhishek Nagar, Anil K. Jain","doi":"10.1109/IJCB.2011.6117550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fingerprint evidence is routinely used by forensics and law enforcement agencies worldwide to apprehend and convict criminals, a practice in use for over 100 years. The use of fingerprints has been accepted as an infallible proof of identity based on two premises: (i) permanence or persistence, and (ii) uniqueness or individuality. However, in the absence of any theoretical results that establish the uniqueness or individuality of fingerprints, the use of fingerprints in various court proceedings is being questioned. This has raised awareness in the forensics community about the need to quantify the evidential value of fingerprint matching. A few studies that have studied this problem estimate this evidential value in one of two ways: (i) feature modeling, where a statistical (generative) model for fingerprint features, primarily minutiae, is developed which is then used to estimate the matching error and (ii) match score modeling, where a set of match scores obtained over a database is used to estimate the matching error rates. Our focus here is on match score modeling and we develop metrics to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed evidential measure. Compared to previous approaches, the proposed measure allows explicit utilization of prior odds. Further, we also incorporate fingerprint image quality to improve the reliability of the estimated evidential value.","PeriodicalId":103913,"journal":{"name":"2011 International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB)","volume":"205 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCB.2011.6117550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

Fingerprint evidence is routinely used by forensics and law enforcement agencies worldwide to apprehend and convict criminals, a practice in use for over 100 years. The use of fingerprints has been accepted as an infallible proof of identity based on two premises: (i) permanence or persistence, and (ii) uniqueness or individuality. However, in the absence of any theoretical results that establish the uniqueness or individuality of fingerprints, the use of fingerprints in various court proceedings is being questioned. This has raised awareness in the forensics community about the need to quantify the evidential value of fingerprint matching. A few studies that have studied this problem estimate this evidential value in one of two ways: (i) feature modeling, where a statistical (generative) model for fingerprint features, primarily minutiae, is developed which is then used to estimate the matching error and (ii) match score modeling, where a set of match scores obtained over a database is used to estimate the matching error rates. Our focus here is on match score modeling and we develop metrics to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed evidential measure. Compared to previous approaches, the proposed measure allows explicit utilization of prior odds. Further, we also incorporate fingerprint image quality to improve the reliability of the estimated evidential value.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论指纹的证据价值
指纹证据通常被世界各地的法医和执法机构用来逮捕和定罪罪犯,这种做法已经使用了100多年。使用指纹已被接受为基于两个前提的绝对可靠的身份证明:(i)永久性或持久性,和(ii)独特性或个别性。然而,由于没有任何理论结果可以确定指纹的独特性或个性,在各种法庭诉讼中使用指纹受到质疑。这提高了法医学界对量化指纹匹配证据价值的必要性的认识。一些研究这个问题的研究以两种方式之一来估计这个证据值:(i)特征建模,其中开发了指纹特征(主要是细节)的统计(生成)模型,然后用于估计匹配误差;(ii)匹配分数建模,其中通过数据库获得的一组匹配分数用于估计匹配错误率。我们在这里的重点是匹配得分模型,我们开发的指标来评估有效性和可靠性提出的证据措施。与以前的方法相比,所提出的方法允许明确利用先验赔率。此外,我们还结合指纹图像质量来提高估计证据值的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Low-resolution face recognition via Simultaneous Discriminant Analysis Fundamental statistics of relatively permanent pigmented or vascular skin marks for criminal and victim identification Biometric recognition of newborns: Identification using palmprints Combination of multiple samples utilizing identification model in biometric systems Face and eye detection on hard datasets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1