Arab EFL Learners’ Writing Errors: A Contrastive Error Analysis Study

Moustafa Mohamed Abdelmohsen
{"title":"Arab EFL Learners’ Writing Errors: A Contrastive Error Analysis Study","authors":"Moustafa Mohamed Abdelmohsen","doi":"10.37745/bjel.2013/vol10n4117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study delved into the impact of students' L1 (Arabic) morphosyntactic system on their L2 writing skills; the influence of Arabic socio-cultural and educational context (where students learn L2) on students’ writing; students’ attitude towards L2 writing and EFL teachers’ perceptions and interpretations of students' writing difficulties. The study was conducted in 8 public higher education institutions in Oman. The participants of the study were 598 Omani EFL students who studied at The General Foundation Program and 54 EFL teachers. The study was underpinned by two theories: transfer of learning theory (Thorndike & Woodworth, 1901) and interlanguage theory (Selinker, 1972). The conceptual framework was arrived at by employing two models, contrastive analysis (CA) and error analysis (EA). A mixed-methods approach was used to collect quantitative and qualitative data employing a questionnaire, semi-structured interview, and a writing test (essay writing). The findings revealed that students’ intralingual (L2 rules) errors were larger than their interlingual (L1 interference) errors. It was also found that students had a positive attitude towards L2 learning. Further, the teachers’ interviews confirmed that teachers were cognizant of students’ writing errors but they could not identify and determine the sources of those errors.","PeriodicalId":151808,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of English Language Linguistics","volume":"181 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of English Language Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37745/bjel.2013/vol10n4117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The present study delved into the impact of students' L1 (Arabic) morphosyntactic system on their L2 writing skills; the influence of Arabic socio-cultural and educational context (where students learn L2) on students’ writing; students’ attitude towards L2 writing and EFL teachers’ perceptions and interpretations of students' writing difficulties. The study was conducted in 8 public higher education institutions in Oman. The participants of the study were 598 Omani EFL students who studied at The General Foundation Program and 54 EFL teachers. The study was underpinned by two theories: transfer of learning theory (Thorndike & Woodworth, 1901) and interlanguage theory (Selinker, 1972). The conceptual framework was arrived at by employing two models, contrastive analysis (CA) and error analysis (EA). A mixed-methods approach was used to collect quantitative and qualitative data employing a questionnaire, semi-structured interview, and a writing test (essay writing). The findings revealed that students’ intralingual (L2 rules) errors were larger than their interlingual (L1 interference) errors. It was also found that students had a positive attitude towards L2 learning. Further, the teachers’ interviews confirmed that teachers were cognizant of students’ writing errors but they could not identify and determine the sources of those errors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿拉伯英语学习者写作错误的对比分析研究
本研究探讨了学生的母语(阿拉伯语)形态句法系统对二语写作技能的影响;阿拉伯社会文化和教育背景(学生学习第二语言的地方)对学生写作的影响;学生对第二语言写作的态度和英语教师对学生写作困难的看法和解释。这项研究在阿曼的8所公立高等教育机构进行。研究对象为598名阿曼普通预科班的英语学生和54名英语教师。该研究以两种理论为基础:学习迁移理论(Thorndike & Woodworth, 1901)和中介语理论(Selinker, 1972)。采用对比分析(CA)和误差分析(EA)两种模型得出了概念框架。采用混合方法收集定量和定性数据,采用问卷调查、半结构化访谈和写作测试(论文写作)。结果显示,学生的语内(第二语言规则)错误大于语外(母语干扰)错误。研究还发现,学生对第二语言学习的态度是积极的。此外,教师的访谈证实,教师认识到学生的写作错误,但他们无法识别和确定这些错误的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Congratulation Strategies: Pragmatic Study Expository Guided Writing for Learners at Elementary Levels Practs of Violence in Ola Rotimi’s OurHusband has gone Mad Again A Critical Stylistic Study of Peter Obi’s Campaign Speech Delivered at Chatham House The Language of Defining Synonyms in LDOCE and OALD between Consistency and Contradiction: A Source of Help or Confusion?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1