A Comparative Study of e-Writing and Traditional Writing Classroom to Improve English Writing Ability and Motivate Autonomous Learning of Thai EFL Learners

Pongpatchara Kawinkoonlasate
{"title":"A Comparative Study of e-Writing and Traditional Writing Classroom to Improve English Writing Ability and Motivate Autonomous Learning of Thai EFL Learners","authors":"Pongpatchara Kawinkoonlasate","doi":"10.30845/IJLL.V6N2P4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purposes of this quasi-experimental study were: 1) to compare students’ writing ability before and after receiving e-Writing program and traditional writing classroom., 2) to compare the differences in learner satisfaction and motivation after receiving e-Writing and traditional writing classroom., and 3) to explore learner autonomy after receiving the two different kinds of teaching methods. The informants were 60-second year students who were divided by quota sampling method into two groups (A and B) of 30 learners each. Group A received an e-Writing method, whereas Group B received a Traditional writing classroom. The research instruments used for data collection were lesson plans, e-Writing program, learner perception questionnaires, interview questions, and English writing test (Pretest and Posttest). The quantitative data were collected and analyzed using average, standard deviation, and t-test. Interview data was analyzed by means of content analysis. The quantitative finding revealed that the English writing ability of the students group under e-Writing teaching was significantly higher than the controlling group at the .001 level. From the questionnaire results, the overall levels of satisfaction and autonomous learning after receiving the e-Writing program were found to be good. Additionally, the interview results showed that the students seemed to enjoy the lessons more in the e-Writing which appeared to promote more learner autonomy than the traditional writing classroom. Recommendations were made and presented in two categories: benefits of future practice and further research.","PeriodicalId":409958,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Linguistics","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30845/IJLL.V6N2P4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purposes of this quasi-experimental study were: 1) to compare students’ writing ability before and after receiving e-Writing program and traditional writing classroom., 2) to compare the differences in learner satisfaction and motivation after receiving e-Writing and traditional writing classroom., and 3) to explore learner autonomy after receiving the two different kinds of teaching methods. The informants were 60-second year students who were divided by quota sampling method into two groups (A and B) of 30 learners each. Group A received an e-Writing method, whereas Group B received a Traditional writing classroom. The research instruments used for data collection were lesson plans, e-Writing program, learner perception questionnaires, interview questions, and English writing test (Pretest and Posttest). The quantitative data were collected and analyzed using average, standard deviation, and t-test. Interview data was analyzed by means of content analysis. The quantitative finding revealed that the English writing ability of the students group under e-Writing teaching was significantly higher than the controlling group at the .001 level. From the questionnaire results, the overall levels of satisfaction and autonomous learning after receiving the e-Writing program were found to be good. Additionally, the interview results showed that the students seemed to enjoy the lessons more in the e-Writing which appeared to promote more learner autonomy than the traditional writing classroom. Recommendations were made and presented in two categories: benefits of future practice and further research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子写作与传统写作课堂的比较研究:提高泰国英语学习者的英语写作能力,激励他们自主学习
本拟实验研究的目的是:1)比较电子写作课程与传统写作课堂前后学生的写作能力。2)比较接受电子写作与传统写作课堂后学习者满意度和学习动机的差异。3)在接受两种不同的教学方法后,探索学习者的自主性。被调查者为60年级学生,采用定额抽样法分为A组和B组,每组30人。A组使用电子写作方法,B组使用传统写作教室。数据收集的研究工具包括教案、电子写作程序、学习者感知问卷、访谈问题和英语写作测试(前测和后测)。收集定量资料,采用平均值、标准差和t检验进行分析。访谈资料采用内容分析法进行分析。定量结果显示,电子写作教学下学生组的英语写作能力显著高于对照组,在0.001水平上。从问卷调查结果来看,接受电子写作计划后的整体满意度和自主学习水平都很好。此外,访谈结果显示,学生似乎更喜欢电子写作课程,这似乎比传统的写作课堂更能促进学习者的自主性。提出了两类建议:未来实践的好处和进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Word Association Responses in L1 and L2 to the Chinese Word Yueliang (Moon): Implications for L2 Vocabulary Instruction Language Maintenance among Minority Languages with Special Reference to Leya Language of Chief Mukuni, Southern Province Kenya Airways Dominant Image Restoration Strategies during the 2015/16 Financial Crisis Students' Grammatical Errors as Corrected by English Teachers at Secondary Schools in Sudan Teacher Supervision Program to Enhance Teacher’s Learning to Teach Glocal Englishes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1