Searching and skimming: An exploratory study

J. Starke, Chris Luce, Jonathan Sillito
{"title":"Searching and skimming: An exploratory study","authors":"J. Starke, Chris Luce, Jonathan Sillito","doi":"10.1109/ICSM.2009.5306335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Source code search is an important activity for programmers working on a change task to a software system. As part of a larger project to improve tool support for finding information in source code, we conducted a formative study in which programmers were asked to perform corrective tasks to a system they were initially unfamiliar with. Our analysis focused specifically on how programmers decide what to search for, and how they decide which results are relevant to their task. Based on our analysis, we present five observations about our participant's approach to finding information and some of the challenges they faced. We also discuss the implications these observations have for the design of source code search tools.","PeriodicalId":247441,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"78","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2009.5306335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 78

Abstract

Source code search is an important activity for programmers working on a change task to a software system. As part of a larger project to improve tool support for finding information in source code, we conducted a formative study in which programmers were asked to perform corrective tasks to a system they were initially unfamiliar with. Our analysis focused specifically on how programmers decide what to search for, and how they decide which results are relevant to their task. Based on our analysis, we present five observations about our participant's approach to finding information and some of the challenges they faced. We also discuss the implications these observations have for the design of source code search tools.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
搜索和略读:一项探索性研究
对于从事软件系统变更任务的程序员来说,源代码搜索是一项重要的活动。作为一个更大的项目的一部分,以改进在源代码中查找信息的工具支持,我们进行了一个形成性的研究,在这个研究中,程序员被要求对他们最初不熟悉的系统执行纠正任务。我们的分析特别关注程序员如何决定搜索什么,以及他们如何决定哪些结果与他们的任务相关。根据我们的分析,我们提出了关于我们的参与者寻找信息的方法和他们面临的一些挑战的五个观察结果。我们还讨论了这些观察结果对源代码搜索工具设计的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interactive views for analyzing problem reports Recovering design rationale from email repositories Maintenance, or the 3rd dimension of eXtreme model-driven design What's hot and what's not: Windowed developer topic analysis On predicting the time taken to correct bug reports in open source projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1