Mobility Barriers for People with Multiple Sclerosis: a Qualitative Study

Atefeh Saadati Qamsari, Shohreh Noorizadeh Dehkordi, Mehdi Dadgoo
{"title":"Mobility Barriers for People with Multiple Sclerosis: a Qualitative Study","authors":"Atefeh Saadati Qamsari, Shohreh Noorizadeh Dehkordi, Mehdi Dadgoo","doi":"10.30699/FDISJ.1.3.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article Info Mobility Barriers for People with Multiple Sclerosis: a Qualitative Study Atefeh Saadati Qamsari1, Shohreh Noorizadeh Dehkordi*2, Mehdi Dadgoo3 1. MSc student of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 2. Associate Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Iranian Center of Excellence for Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 3. Assisstant Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Iranian Center of Excellence for Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Background & Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify the experiences of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) from mobility barriers they are faced with. Methods: This study included 13 patients with MS (7 women and 6 men), with informed consent, whose average age is 43 years. A qualitative content analysis approach was used. According to the EDSS criteria, the severity of their disability was between 8-4. The sampling was carried out purposefully with maximum variation, and the data was collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews. Immediately after each interview, the data was analyzed using the Cheevakumjorn`s method. Results: After analyzing the obtained data and categorizing the resulting codes; three main categories were observed: “disease-affected barriers”, “personal barriers” and “environmental barriers”. The data of each theme were classified as subthemes. Conclusion: Based on research findings and experiences of the participants, rehabilitation specialists during the assessment, management and treatment of patients with MS should alert and educate patients about personal mobility barriers and try to help them fit in their physical environment.","PeriodicalId":330157,"journal":{"name":"Function and Disability Journal","volume":"93 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Function and Disability Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30699/FDISJ.1.3.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Article Info Mobility Barriers for People with Multiple Sclerosis: a Qualitative Study Atefeh Saadati Qamsari1, Shohreh Noorizadeh Dehkordi*2, Mehdi Dadgoo3 1. MSc student of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 2. Associate Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Iranian Center of Excellence for Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 3. Assisstant Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Iranian Center of Excellence for Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Background & Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify the experiences of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) from mobility barriers they are faced with. Methods: This study included 13 patients with MS (7 women and 6 men), with informed consent, whose average age is 43 years. A qualitative content analysis approach was used. According to the EDSS criteria, the severity of their disability was between 8-4. The sampling was carried out purposefully with maximum variation, and the data was collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews. Immediately after each interview, the data was analyzed using the Cheevakumjorn`s method. Results: After analyzing the obtained data and categorizing the resulting codes; three main categories were observed: “disease-affected barriers”, “personal barriers” and “environmental barriers”. The data of each theme were classified as subthemes. Conclusion: Based on research findings and experiences of the participants, rehabilitation specialists during the assessment, management and treatment of patients with MS should alert and educate patients about personal mobility barriers and try to help them fit in their physical environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多发性硬化症患者的行动障碍:一项定性研究
文章信息:多发性硬化症患者行动障碍的定性研究[j], [j], [j]。伊朗医学大学康复科学学院物理治疗理学硕士,伊朗德黑兰伊朗医学科学大学康复科学学院伊朗卓越物理治疗中心物理治疗系副教授,伊朗德黑兰2。背景与目的:本研究的目的是确定多发性硬化症(MS)患者所面临的行动障碍的经历。方法:本研究纳入13例MS患者(女7例,男6例),经知情同意,平均年龄43岁。采用定性内容分析方法。根据EDSS的标准,他们的残疾严重程度在8-4之间。抽样有目的性,方差最大,采用半结构化深度访谈的方式收集数据。每次访谈结束后,数据立即使用Cheevakumjorn的方法进行分析。结果:对所得数据进行分析,并对所得代码进行分类;观察到三个主要类别:"疾病影响障碍"、"个人障碍"和"环境障碍"。每个主题的数据被分类为子主题。结论:根据研究结果和参与者的经验,康复专家在评估、管理和治疗MS患者时应提醒和教育患者个人行动障碍,并努力帮助他们适应物理环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perception and Experiences of Rehabilitation Service Providers of Teamwork Barriers in Tehran Province, Iran The Relationship Between Balance and Fine Motor Skills in Children With Intellectual Disability Gap in Noise Auditory Brainstem Responses: A Systematic Review The Effect of Vocal Warm up and Cool Down Exercises on the Acoustic Characteristics in Speech and Language Pathologists: A Pilot Study Application of the Model of Human Occupation (MOHO) in Psychosocial Needs of Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1