Broadcasting legislation in France over the past twenty years. Main themes, shortcomings and unanswered questions

Cathodon, L. Libbrecht
{"title":"Broadcasting legislation in France over the past twenty years. Main themes, shortcomings and unanswered questions","authors":"Cathodon, L. Libbrecht","doi":"10.3406/RESO.1995.3299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary: A comparison of two images of the French audiovisual landscape, with an interval of twenty years between them (1972-92), reveals that the development of broadcasting law during the past two decades has been broadly consistent, it has promoted the constitution of a private pole along with public services henceforth freed from political control, and the replacement of a statutory approach by regulation entrusted to an independent authority disposing of the required legal and material means. This evolution did not, however, take place without prevarication. For three steps forwards there was at least one step amiss, or even backwards. Many questions remain unanswered, whether on the role of the regulatory authority, the contents and financing of public service programmes, the status of communications firms or, more generally, the responsibilities of the public authorities in this sector.","PeriodicalId":213999,"journal":{"name":"Réseaux. The French journal of communication","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Réseaux. The French journal of communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/RESO.1995.3299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary: A comparison of two images of the French audiovisual landscape, with an interval of twenty years between them (1972-92), reveals that the development of broadcasting law during the past two decades has been broadly consistent, it has promoted the constitution of a private pole along with public services henceforth freed from political control, and the replacement of a statutory approach by regulation entrusted to an independent authority disposing of the required legal and material means. This evolution did not, however, take place without prevarication. For three steps forwards there was at least one step amiss, or even backwards. Many questions remain unanswered, whether on the role of the regulatory authority, the contents and financing of public service programmes, the status of communications firms or, more generally, the responsibilities of the public authorities in this sector.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法国过去二十年的广播立法。主要主题,缺点和未解决的问题
简介:对法国视听景观的两幅图像进行比较,两者之间的间隔为二十年(1972- 1992),揭示了广播法在过去二十年中的发展大体上是一致的,它促进了私人机构的宪法以及从此摆脱政治控制的公共服务,并通过委托给独立机构处理所需的法律和物质手段的监管取代了法定方法。然而,这种演变并非没有推诿之辞。每向前走三步,至少有一步是错的,甚至是后退一步。许多问题仍然没有得到解答,无论是关于管理当局的作用、公共服务方案的内容和资金筹措、通讯公司的地位,还是更一般地说,关于公共当局在这个部门的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pluralisme et infomédiation sociale de l'actualité : le cas de Twitter Creation of value on the Internet Mediation and Social History of Art Accounting for viewing styles: viewers' negotiation with TV as a cultural offering. The intentions of communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1