Comparison of the effectiveness of captopril and olmesartan in hypertensive patients

{"title":"Comparison of the effectiveness of captopril and olmesartan in hypertensive patients","authors":"","doi":"10.51271/kmj-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Hypertensive conditions are situations that require immediate intervention in emergency services. Captopril is one of the most commonly used drugs in patients presenting to emergency departments with high blood pressure. In this study; we aimed to find an answer to the question of whether orally administered olmesartan could be an alternative to captopril in urgent hypertensive situations. \nMaterial and Method: In this study, blood pressure measurements were made after a 5-minute rest period in patients who presented to the emergency department of our hospital with the diagnosis of hypertension. Patients with a blood pressure of 180/100 mmHg and above and no signs of end-organ damage were followed up. Forty patients were given sublingual captopril 25 mg, and the other 40 patients were given 40 mg of olmesartan, and they were allowed to swallow the drug with some water. Afterward, the patients were followed for 3 hours (with blood pressure and pulse measurements), and their blood pressure was measured and recorded at five-minute intervals. \nResults: The mean age of the patients receiving captopril was 60.70±11.43 years, and the mean age of the patients receiving olmesartan was 57.02±13.86 years. Of the patients receiving captopril, 19 (57.5%) were male, 21 (52.5%) were female, 17 (42.5%) of the patients receiving olmesartan were male and 23 (57.5%) were female. In this study, patients treated with captopril and olmesartan were monitored for 3 hours and the differences between them in pulse and blood pressure measurements were evaluated. When the systolic blood pressures were compared, the difference at the tenth minute was significant, but the difference between the other minutes was not significant. Differences in diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were not significant. \nConclusion: Oral administration of olmesartan in emergency hypertensive patients may be an alternative to captopril due to its effectiveness in reducing mortality and morbidity.","PeriodicalId":369732,"journal":{"name":"Kastamonu Medical Journal","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kastamonu Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51271/kmj-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Hypertensive conditions are situations that require immediate intervention in emergency services. Captopril is one of the most commonly used drugs in patients presenting to emergency departments with high blood pressure. In this study; we aimed to find an answer to the question of whether orally administered olmesartan could be an alternative to captopril in urgent hypertensive situations. Material and Method: In this study, blood pressure measurements were made after a 5-minute rest period in patients who presented to the emergency department of our hospital with the diagnosis of hypertension. Patients with a blood pressure of 180/100 mmHg and above and no signs of end-organ damage were followed up. Forty patients were given sublingual captopril 25 mg, and the other 40 patients were given 40 mg of olmesartan, and they were allowed to swallow the drug with some water. Afterward, the patients were followed for 3 hours (with blood pressure and pulse measurements), and their blood pressure was measured and recorded at five-minute intervals. Results: The mean age of the patients receiving captopril was 60.70±11.43 years, and the mean age of the patients receiving olmesartan was 57.02±13.86 years. Of the patients receiving captopril, 19 (57.5%) were male, 21 (52.5%) were female, 17 (42.5%) of the patients receiving olmesartan were male and 23 (57.5%) were female. In this study, patients treated with captopril and olmesartan were monitored for 3 hours and the differences between them in pulse and blood pressure measurements were evaluated. When the systolic blood pressures were compared, the difference at the tenth minute was significant, but the difference between the other minutes was not significant. Differences in diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were not significant. Conclusion: Oral administration of olmesartan in emergency hypertensive patients may be an alternative to captopril due to its effectiveness in reducing mortality and morbidity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡托普利与奥美沙坦治疗高血压的疗效比较
目的:高血压是需要紧急服务立即干预的情况。卡托普利是急诊科高血压患者最常用的药物之一。在本研究中;我们的目的是找到一个问题的答案,口服奥美沙坦是否可以替代卡托普利在紧急高血压情况下。材料与方法:在本研究中,在我院急诊科诊断为高血压的患者休息5分钟后测量血压。对血压180/100 mmHg及以上且无终末器官损伤迹象的患者进行随访。40例患者给予卡托普利25 mg舌下,另外40例患者给予奥美沙坦40 mg,并允许他们用水吞下药物。随后,随访患者3小时(测量血压和脉搏),每隔5分钟测量并记录血压。结果:卡托普利组患者平均年龄为60.70±11.43岁,奥美沙坦组患者平均年龄为57.02±13.86岁。接受卡托普利治疗的患者中,男性19例(57.5%),女性21例(52.5%);接受奥美沙坦治疗的患者中,男性17例(42.5%),女性23例(57.5%)。在这项研究中,使用卡托普利和奥美沙坦治疗的患者监测3小时,并评估他们在脉搏和血压测量方面的差异。当比较收缩压时,在第10分钟的差异是显著的,但其他分钟之间的差异不显著。舒张压和心率差异不显著。结论:急诊高血压患者口服奥美沙坦可有效降低死亡率和发病率,可替代卡托普利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health follow-up visits of children with autism How much did the February 6 earthquakes affect a distant hospital? The effect of general anesthesia applied during cesarean section on newborn bilirubin Ultrasound-guided neuromonitoring methods in the intensive care unit Pulmonary candidiasis presenting as tumor-like shadow
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1