Usability Evaluation of Facebook and Instagram by Visually Impaired People

Amna Sajid, Muhammad Zafar Ullah, B. Shahzad, Aaqib Adeel, Naveed Ahmad
{"title":"Usability Evaluation of Facebook and Instagram by Visually Impaired People","authors":"Amna Sajid, Muhammad Zafar Ullah, B. Shahzad, Aaqib Adeel, Naveed Ahmad","doi":"10.33411/ijist/2022040405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction/Importance of Study: Social networking websites have become the main medium for communication, information sharing, entertainment, buying/selling, and various other purposes. People of every age use social networking websites, and their usage is increasing daily, especially in current circumstances. People with different abilities also used social networking websites, but each set of users had their requirements forusing these websites. Visually impaired people use computers and the web with the help of screen reading tools e. g.; jaws, NVDA. Screen reading tools read a web page sequentially, which wastime-consuming. The major problem with screen reading tools came while reading visual content. Screen reading tools only read the alternate texts of non-visual contents behind their tag. This research focuses on the usability Usability of social networking websitesfor visually impaired people. Two of the most commonly used social networking websites, Facebook and Instagram, were selected for the usability evaluation. Accessibility, efficiency, and effectiveness were the metrics of Usability, which were evaluated in this study.\nNovelty statement: A consolidated set of guidelines specific to social networking websites were presented in which some new guidelines were also proposed for Facebook. A mock interface was developed based on the proposed guidelines for Facebook.\nMaterial and Method: For the evaluation of Usability, a controlled experiment was conducted with 28 visually impaired people in which 16 participants evaluated Facebook and 12 evaluated Instagram to find the usability problems faced by visually impaired people.\nResult and Discussion: Results show that Instagram was as easy to use asFacebook when used by visually impaired people with the help of screen reading tools. \nConcluding Remarks: This research evaluated the Usability of social networking websites Facebook and Instagram by visually impaired people. A controlled experiment was conducted for their evaluation. Results showed that Facebook was difficult to use as Instagram. Thus, new guidelines were proposed for Facebook and based on the guidelines, a prototype was proposed.","PeriodicalId":354463,"journal":{"name":"Vol 4 Issue 4","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vol 4 Issue 4","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33411/ijist/2022040405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/Importance of Study: Social networking websites have become the main medium for communication, information sharing, entertainment, buying/selling, and various other purposes. People of every age use social networking websites, and their usage is increasing daily, especially in current circumstances. People with different abilities also used social networking websites, but each set of users had their requirements forusing these websites. Visually impaired people use computers and the web with the help of screen reading tools e. g.; jaws, NVDA. Screen reading tools read a web page sequentially, which wastime-consuming. The major problem with screen reading tools came while reading visual content. Screen reading tools only read the alternate texts of non-visual contents behind their tag. This research focuses on the usability Usability of social networking websitesfor visually impaired people. Two of the most commonly used social networking websites, Facebook and Instagram, were selected for the usability evaluation. Accessibility, efficiency, and effectiveness were the metrics of Usability, which were evaluated in this study. Novelty statement: A consolidated set of guidelines specific to social networking websites were presented in which some new guidelines were also proposed for Facebook. A mock interface was developed based on the proposed guidelines for Facebook. Material and Method: For the evaluation of Usability, a controlled experiment was conducted with 28 visually impaired people in which 16 participants evaluated Facebook and 12 evaluated Instagram to find the usability problems faced by visually impaired people. Result and Discussion: Results show that Instagram was as easy to use asFacebook when used by visually impaired people with the help of screen reading tools. Concluding Remarks: This research evaluated the Usability of social networking websites Facebook and Instagram by visually impaired people. A controlled experiment was conducted for their evaluation. Results showed that Facebook was difficult to use as Instagram. Thus, new guidelines were proposed for Facebook and based on the guidelines, a prototype was proposed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视障人士对Facebook和Instagram的可用性评价
学习简介/重要性:社交网站已经成为人们交流、分享信息、娱乐、买卖等各种目的的主要媒介。每个年龄段的人都在使用社交网站,而且它们的使用量每天都在增加,尤其是在当前的情况下。不同能力的人也使用社交网站,但每组用户使用这些网站都有自己的要求。视障人士借助屏幕阅读工具使用电脑和网络,例如;下巴,改良式戏剧活动。屏幕阅读工具按顺序阅读网页,这很耗时。屏幕阅读工具的主要问题出现在阅读视觉内容时。屏幕阅读工具只能读取标签后面的非视觉内容的替代文本。本研究的重点是视障人士社交网站的可用性。两个最常用的社交网站,Facebook和Instagram,被选中进行可用性评估。可访问性、效率和有效性是可用性的度量标准,在本研究中进行了评估。新颖性声明:提出了一套针对社交网站的综合指导方针,其中也提出了一些针对Facebook的新指导方针。一个模拟界面是根据Facebook的建议准则开发的。材料与方法:对于易用性的评估,我们对28名视障人士进行了对照实验,其中16名参与者评估Facebook, 12名参与者评估Instagram,以发现视障人士面临的可用性问题。结果和讨论:结果表明,当视障人士在屏幕阅读工具的帮助下使用Instagram时,Instagram和facebook一样容易使用。结语:本研究评估了视障人士对社交网站Facebook和Instagram的可用性。为了对其进行评价,进行了对照实验。结果显示,Facebook很难像Instagram一样使用。因此,为Facebook提出了新的指导方针,并在此基础上提出了原型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Usability Evaluation of Facebook and Instagram by Visually Impaired People A Survey Paper on ASCII-Based Cryptographic Techniques The Significance of Cognitive Distortions and Risk Factors Due to Android Games Addictions for Adults Meme Detection of Journalists from Social Media by Using Data Mining Techniques Role of Agile Methodologies for Ensuring Quality in Complex Systems: A Systematic Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1