Data association — solution or avoidance: Evaluation of a filter based on RFS framework and factor graphs with SME

Dhiraj Gulati, Uzair Sharif, Feihu Zhang, Daniel Clarke, A. Knoll
{"title":"Data association — solution or avoidance: Evaluation of a filter based on RFS framework and factor graphs with SME","authors":"Dhiraj Gulati, Uzair Sharif, Feihu Zhang, Daniel Clarke, A. Knoll","doi":"10.1109/MFI.2017.8170349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data or measurement-to-track association is an integral and expensive part of any solution performing multi-target multi-sensor Cooperative Localization (CL) for better state estimation. Various performance evaluations have been performed between various state-of-the-art solutions, but they have been often limited within same family of algorithms. However, there exist solutions which avoid the task of data association to perform the CL in a multi-target multi-sensor environment. Factor Graphs using Symmetric Measurement Equations (SMEs) factor is one such solution. In this paper we compare and contrast the state estimation using state-of-the-art Random Finite Set (RFS) approach and using a Factor Graph solution with SMEs. For a RFS we use multi-sensor multi-object with the Generalized Labeled Multi-Bernoulli (GLMB) Filter. These two solution use conceptually different approaches, GLMB Filter solves the data association implicitly, but Factor Graph based solution avoids the task altogether. Simulations present an interesting results where for simple scenarios implemented GLMB filter performs efficiently. But the performance of GLMB Filter degrades faster than Factor Graphs using SMEs when the error in the sensors increase.","PeriodicalId":402371,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems (MFI)","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems (MFI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MFI.2017.8170349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Data or measurement-to-track association is an integral and expensive part of any solution performing multi-target multi-sensor Cooperative Localization (CL) for better state estimation. Various performance evaluations have been performed between various state-of-the-art solutions, but they have been often limited within same family of algorithms. However, there exist solutions which avoid the task of data association to perform the CL in a multi-target multi-sensor environment. Factor Graphs using Symmetric Measurement Equations (SMEs) factor is one such solution. In this paper we compare and contrast the state estimation using state-of-the-art Random Finite Set (RFS) approach and using a Factor Graph solution with SMEs. For a RFS we use multi-sensor multi-object with the Generalized Labeled Multi-Bernoulli (GLMB) Filter. These two solution use conceptually different approaches, GLMB Filter solves the data association implicitly, but Factor Graph based solution avoids the task altogether. Simulations present an interesting results where for simple scenarios implemented GLMB filter performs efficiently. But the performance of GLMB Filter degrades faster than Factor Graphs using SMEs when the error in the sensors increase.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数据关联-解决或避免:基于RFS框架和SME因子图的过滤器评估
数据或测量-跟踪关联是执行多目标多传感器协同定位(CL)以获得更好的状态估计的任何解决方案中不可或缺且昂贵的一部分。在各种最先进的解决方案之间进行了各种性能评估,但它们通常受限于同一类算法。然而,在多目标多传感器环境下,已有解决方案可以避免数据关联任务来执行CL。利用对称测量方程(SMEs)的因子图就是这样一种解决方案。在本文中,我们比较和对比了使用最先进的随机有限集(RFS)方法和使用中小企业的因子图解决方案的状态估计。对于RFS,我们使用了多传感器多目标和广义标记多伯努利(GLMB)滤波器。这两种解决方案使用了概念上不同的方法,GLMB Filter隐式地解决了数据关联,而基于因子图的解决方案完全避免了这个任务。仿真显示了一个有趣的结果,在简单的场景中实现的GLMB滤波器可以有效地执行。但当传感器误差增加时,GLMB滤波器的性能比使用sme的因子图下降得更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Deep reinforcement learning algorithms for steering an underactuated ship Data analytics development of FDR (Flight Data Recorder) data for airline maintenance operations Underwater Terrain Navigation Using Standard Sea Charts and Magnetic Field Maps Musculoskeletal model of a pregnant woman considering stretched rectus abdominis and co-contraction muscle activation Compressive sensing based data collection in wireless sensor networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1