Rethinking the Effectiveness of Consumer Protection Policies and Measures in the Financial Marketplace

W. Iheme
{"title":"Rethinking the Effectiveness of Consumer Protection Policies and Measures in the Financial Marketplace","authors":"W. Iheme","doi":"10.18485/union_pf_ccr.2021.ch18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper identifies and challenges the frequent practice of financial institutions in designing and selling complex financial products to consumers who are not able to fully comprehend them, thus unable to make informed decisions before consumption. Tricking consumers to inadvertently purchase complex financial products, generally causes them to suffer financial losses, which on aggregate, has negative ripple effects in society. The paper discusses the reasons financial institutions are motivated to sell complex financial products, and notes how their success in this regard is nourished by the inadequacies of regulatory systems, among other things. The law of contract is identified as aiding to create a fertile ground through its freedom of contract and caveat emptor rules that make the abuses of financial consumers often unnoticed or appreciated by regulators, thus requiring the former to largely pull themselves up by their own bootstraps. The paper points out the weaknesses in the typical policy measures against exploitation and the mangled rules of disclosure which largely place the burden of comprehension of complex financial products on consumers notwithstanding the machinations of financial institutions toward diminishing comprehension: most financial information booklets are sprinkled heavily with financial terminologies and in complicated language whilst still satisfying the legal requirements of disclosure. The paper proposes a new form of disclosure rule based on the concepts of caveat venditor and contra proferentem, which respectively should require a financial institution’s presentation of information against self-interest, and the unambiguous presentation of equal number of disadvantages alongside the advantages of the products they offer to their consumers. The paper further argues that the principal role of regulators and courts in the circumstance, should be to supervise and assess the level of compliance, and consequently issue on annual basis, a rated performance certificate which financial institutions must post conspicuously on their websites and places of business, and also incorporate same in the information leaflets wherein they described their products, so that consumers can know at a glance those financial institutions that are, or not consumer friendly.","PeriodicalId":123845,"journal":{"name":"Consumer Legal & Oversight eJournal","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consumer Legal & Oversight eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18485/union_pf_ccr.2021.ch18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper identifies and challenges the frequent practice of financial institutions in designing and selling complex financial products to consumers who are not able to fully comprehend them, thus unable to make informed decisions before consumption. Tricking consumers to inadvertently purchase complex financial products, generally causes them to suffer financial losses, which on aggregate, has negative ripple effects in society. The paper discusses the reasons financial institutions are motivated to sell complex financial products, and notes how their success in this regard is nourished by the inadequacies of regulatory systems, among other things. The law of contract is identified as aiding to create a fertile ground through its freedom of contract and caveat emptor rules that make the abuses of financial consumers often unnoticed or appreciated by regulators, thus requiring the former to largely pull themselves up by their own bootstraps. The paper points out the weaknesses in the typical policy measures against exploitation and the mangled rules of disclosure which largely place the burden of comprehension of complex financial products on consumers notwithstanding the machinations of financial institutions toward diminishing comprehension: most financial information booklets are sprinkled heavily with financial terminologies and in complicated language whilst still satisfying the legal requirements of disclosure. The paper proposes a new form of disclosure rule based on the concepts of caveat venditor and contra proferentem, which respectively should require a financial institution’s presentation of information against self-interest, and the unambiguous presentation of equal number of disadvantages alongside the advantages of the products they offer to their consumers. The paper further argues that the principal role of regulators and courts in the circumstance, should be to supervise and assess the level of compliance, and consequently issue on annual basis, a rated performance certificate which financial institutions must post conspicuously on their websites and places of business, and also incorporate same in the information leaflets wherein they described their products, so that consumers can know at a glance those financial institutions that are, or not consumer friendly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新思考金融市场中消费者保护政策和措施的有效性
本文指出并挑战了金融机构在设计和销售复杂金融产品时经常出现的做法,消费者无法完全理解这些产品,因此无法在消费前做出明智的决定。欺骗消费者在不经意间购买复杂的金融产品,通常会使消费者遭受经济损失,总的来说,这在社会上产生了负面的连锁反应。本文讨论了金融机构销售复杂金融产品的动机,并指出监管体系的不足等因素如何滋养了金融机构在这方面的成功。合同法被认为有助于通过其合同自由和“买者自负”规则创造肥沃的土壤,这些规则使金融消费者的滥用行为往往被监管机构忽视或欣赏,从而要求前者在很大程度上依靠自己的力量。本文指出了典型的反剥削政策措施的弱点和披露规则的缺陷,这些缺陷在很大程度上把理解复杂金融产品的负担放在了消费者身上,尽管金融机构的意图是减少理解:大多数金融信息小册子都大量地散布着金融术语和复杂的语言,同时仍然满足披露的法律要求。本文提出了一种新的披露规则形式,基于警告供应商和反对优惠条款的概念,这两个概念分别要求金融机构对自身利益的信息进行陈述,并明确地将其提供给消费者的产品的优势与劣势数量相等。本文进一步认为,在这种情况下,监管机构和法院的主要作用应该是监督和评估合规水平,并因此每年颁发一份评级绩效证书,金融机构必须在其网站和营业场所的显眼位置张贴,并将其纳入描述其产品的信息传单中,以便消费者可以一目了然地了解那些金融机构。或者对消费者不友好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leaving the (fund) gate ajar: investor protection or marketing ploy? Rethinking the Effectiveness of Consumer Protection Policies and Measures in the Financial Marketplace Regulation Best Interest and the Standards of Conduct for Securities Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers Do FinTech Lenders Fairly Allocate Loans Among Investors? Quid Pro Quo and Regulatory Scrutiny in Marketplace Lending Why People Fall Prey to Ponzi Schemes: An Analysis of Attitudes, Behaviours, Demographics and Motivations of Victims in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1