Do FinTech Lenders Fairly Allocate Loans Among Investors? Quid Pro Quo and Regulatory Scrutiny in Marketplace Lending

Liting Chiu, B. Wolfe, Woongsun Yoo
{"title":"Do FinTech Lenders Fairly Allocate Loans Among Investors? Quid Pro Quo and Regulatory Scrutiny in Marketplace Lending","authors":"Liting Chiu, B. Wolfe, Woongsun Yoo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3281358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marketplace lending platforms select which investors will have the opportunity to fund loans. Platforms claim to fairly allocate loans between retail and institutional investors, but we provide evidence that contradicts this claim. Institutional investors are allocated loans with lower default rates after controlling for interest rates, consistent with a quid pro quo exchange for volume commitments. However, when regulators are most likely to monitor the platform, we find that institutional-investor favor wanes, and platforms redirect lower default rate loans to retail investors. The evidence suggests platforms adjust allocation behavior to avoid costly regulatory intervention.","PeriodicalId":123845,"journal":{"name":"Consumer Legal & Oversight eJournal","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consumer Legal & Oversight eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3281358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Marketplace lending platforms select which investors will have the opportunity to fund loans. Platforms claim to fairly allocate loans between retail and institutional investors, but we provide evidence that contradicts this claim. Institutional investors are allocated loans with lower default rates after controlling for interest rates, consistent with a quid pro quo exchange for volume commitments. However, when regulators are most likely to monitor the platform, we find that institutional-investor favor wanes, and platforms redirect lower default rate loans to retail investors. The evidence suggests platforms adjust allocation behavior to avoid costly regulatory intervention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融科技贷款机构在投资者之间公平分配贷款吗?市场借贷中的交换条件和监管审查
市场借贷平台选择哪些投资者将有机会为贷款提供资金。平台声称在散户和机构投资者之间公平分配贷款,但我们提供的证据与这一说法相矛盾。在控制利率后,机构投资者被分配到违约率较低的贷款,这与数量承诺的交换条件一致。然而,当监管机构最有可能监控平台时,我们发现机构投资者的青睐减弱,平台将较低违约率的贷款重新定向给散户投资者。有证据表明,平台会调整配置行为,以避免代价高昂的监管干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leaving the (fund) gate ajar: investor protection or marketing ploy? Rethinking the Effectiveness of Consumer Protection Policies and Measures in the Financial Marketplace Regulation Best Interest and the Standards of Conduct for Securities Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers Do FinTech Lenders Fairly Allocate Loans Among Investors? Quid Pro Quo and Regulatory Scrutiny in Marketplace Lending Why People Fall Prey to Ponzi Schemes: An Analysis of Attitudes, Behaviours, Demographics and Motivations of Victims in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1