Problems in the archaeological study of Medieval Bilhorod and its ceramics (based on the excavations of one of the pottery workshop)

I. Teslenko, L. Myronenko
{"title":"Problems in the archaeological study of Medieval Bilhorod and its ceramics (based on the excavations of one of the pottery workshop)","authors":"I. Teslenko, L. Myronenko","doi":"10.46535/ca.29.2.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The medieval city and fortress built on the ruins of ancient Tyras at the mouth of the Dniester (the territory of modern Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi, Ukraine) are among the key archaeological sites of the Northern Black Sea region of the late Byzantine and Ottoman times. Despite the long term of excavation in the site and the large explored area, the chronology of its cultural layers and ceramics from them, as well as the declared origin of some groups of the pottery cause reasonable doubts. That is why the re-examination of ‘old’ excavation data from the perspective of new achievements of medieval archaeology and ceramology in the Northern Black Sea region is the focus of our study. The article analyses in detail the excavation materials in the area of one of the pottery workshops, which from 1970s were considered as a reference for dating the construction periods of a medieval settlement outside the fortress walls. The study of the archival documentation and ceramic collections allowed us to find out that the cessation of the activity of the pottery workshop dates back to the second half of the 15th century and not to the beginning of the 14th century as has been regarded before. So subsequent dwellings and other constructions were built, accordingly, more than 100 years later than previously thought. Hence we have obtained a strong case for significantly correcting the chronology of the cultural horizons of medieval Bilhorod. Moreover, it become possible to clarify ideas about ceramic production and the historical topography of the city, as well as to outline the topical questions for future research.","PeriodicalId":169679,"journal":{"name":"Cercetări Arheologice","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cercetări Arheologice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46535/ca.29.2.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The medieval city and fortress built on the ruins of ancient Tyras at the mouth of the Dniester (the territory of modern Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi, Ukraine) are among the key archaeological sites of the Northern Black Sea region of the late Byzantine and Ottoman times. Despite the long term of excavation in the site and the large explored area, the chronology of its cultural layers and ceramics from them, as well as the declared origin of some groups of the pottery cause reasonable doubts. That is why the re-examination of ‘old’ excavation data from the perspective of new achievements of medieval archaeology and ceramology in the Northern Black Sea region is the focus of our study. The article analyses in detail the excavation materials in the area of one of the pottery workshops, which from 1970s were considered as a reference for dating the construction periods of a medieval settlement outside the fortress walls. The study of the archival documentation and ceramic collections allowed us to find out that the cessation of the activity of the pottery workshop dates back to the second half of the 15th century and not to the beginning of the 14th century as has been regarded before. So subsequent dwellings and other constructions were built, accordingly, more than 100 years later than previously thought. Hence we have obtained a strong case for significantly correcting the chronology of the cultural horizons of medieval Bilhorod. Moreover, it become possible to clarify ideas about ceramic production and the historical topography of the city, as well as to outline the topical questions for future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中世纪比荷洛德及其陶器考古研究中的若干问题(基于一个陶器作坊的发掘)
这座中世纪的城市和堡垒建在德涅斯特河口的古代Tyras遗址上(现在乌克兰Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi的领土),是拜占庭晚期和奥斯曼时代黑海北部地区的重要考古遗址之一。尽管在该遗址进行了长期的挖掘和大面积的探索,但其文化层和从中产生的陶瓷的年代,以及一些陶器群体的宣布来源,都引起了合理的怀疑。这就是为什么从中世纪考古学和陶艺学新成就的角度重新审视“旧”挖掘数据是我们研究的重点。文章详细分析了其中一个陶器作坊地区的挖掘材料,这些材料从20世纪70年代开始被认为是确定堡垒墙外中世纪定居点建设时期的参考。通过对档案文件和陶瓷收藏品的研究,我们发现陶器作坊的停止活动可以追溯到15世纪下半叶,而不是像以前认为的那样是14世纪初。因此,随后的住宅和其他建筑相应地建成,比之前认为的晚了100多年。因此,我们已经获得了一个强有力的案例,以显着纠正中世纪比荷罗德文化视野的年表。此外,它还可以澄清有关陶瓷生产和城市历史地形的想法,并概述未来研究的主题问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gladiatori și spectacole în amfiteatru în cetăţile greceşti de la Pontul Euxin Axiopolis. Stadiul actual al cunoașterii The Sanctuaries of Iupiter Dolichenus in the Danubian Provinces. A functional interpretation Grylloi: A Being with Mixed Depictions from Konya Women and Roman religion in Dacia: the epigraphic evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1