Comparison of Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Blood Flow in an Ascending Aortic Aneurysm

A. Petuchova, A. Maknickas
{"title":"Comparison of Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Blood Flow in an Ascending Aortic Aneurysm","authors":"A. Petuchova, A. Maknickas","doi":"10.22489/CinC.2022.085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work aimed to perform a numerical study of aortic hemodynamics and evaluate both Newtonian and non-Newtonian blood flow parameters in an ascending aortic aneurysm model. An aortic model was reconstructed from a medical computed tomography (CT) image, and finite element method laminar blood flow modelling was performed using different blood parameters. The inflow boundary conditions were defined as a flow profile, and the outlet boundary conditions were defined as the pressure at each outlet. The first simulation was calculated by considering blood as a Newtonian fluid, while in the second simulation, using the Carreau model, blood was assumed to be a non-Newtonian fluid. The results showed that average systolic and diastolic velocities were 2% and 9% higher, respectively, for the non-Newtonian fluid. In addition, the wall shear stress (WSS) values on the surface of the aneurysm were 30% higher during systole in the non-Newtonian simulation, while the average WSS on the artery surface in diastole was 20% higher for the Newtonian fluid.","PeriodicalId":117840,"journal":{"name":"2022 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2022.085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This work aimed to perform a numerical study of aortic hemodynamics and evaluate both Newtonian and non-Newtonian blood flow parameters in an ascending aortic aneurysm model. An aortic model was reconstructed from a medical computed tomography (CT) image, and finite element method laminar blood flow modelling was performed using different blood parameters. The inflow boundary conditions were defined as a flow profile, and the outlet boundary conditions were defined as the pressure at each outlet. The first simulation was calculated by considering blood as a Newtonian fluid, while in the second simulation, using the Carreau model, blood was assumed to be a non-Newtonian fluid. The results showed that average systolic and diastolic velocities were 2% and 9% higher, respectively, for the non-Newtonian fluid. In addition, the wall shear stress (WSS) values on the surface of the aneurysm were 30% higher during systole in the non-Newtonian simulation, while the average WSS on the artery surface in diastole was 20% higher for the Newtonian fluid.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
升主动脉瘤牛顿与非牛顿血流的比较
本研究旨在对主动脉血流动力学进行数值研究,并在升主动脉瘤模型中评估牛顿和非牛顿血流参数。利用医学计算机断层扫描(CT)图像重建主动脉模型,并利用不同的血液参数进行有限元层流血流建模。流入边界条件定义为流动剖面,出口边界条件定义为各出口的压力。第一次模拟将血液视为牛顿流体,而在第二次模拟中,使用careau模型,将血液假设为非牛顿流体。结果表明,非牛顿流体的平均收缩和舒张速度分别高出2%和9%。此外,在非牛顿流体模拟中,收缩期动脉瘤表面的壁面剪切应力(WSS)值高出30%,而在牛顿流体模拟中,舒张期动脉表面的平均WSS值高出20%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Nonlinear Dynamic Response of Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate to Uterine Pressure Heart Pulse Demodulation from Emfit Mattress Sensor Using Spectral and Source Separation Techniques Automated Algorithm for QRS Detection in Cardiac Arrest Patients with PEA Extraction Algorithm for Morphologically Preserved Non-Invasive Multi-Channel Fetal ECG Improved Pulse Pressure Estimation Based on Imaging Photoplethysmographic Signals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1