With so many battery electric buses in operation, why are fuel cell electric buses more relevant than ever?

Kristina F. Juelsgaard, David J. Yorke
{"title":"With so many battery electric buses in operation, why are fuel cell electric buses more relevant than ever?","authors":"Kristina F. Juelsgaard, David J. Yorke","doi":"10.54337/ojs.td.v30i.7913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The bus industry has been a frontrunner in the adoption of zero emission vehicles and their operation. In 2022, zero-emission buses accounted for approximately 12.7%1 of new bus registrations in the European Union, with the uptake growing year on year. Fuel Cell Electric buses (FCEB) and Battery Electric buses (BEB) are complementary zero-emission technologies, and while both offer advantages for fleet operators, there are significant differences that can impact the choice of vehicle:• BEBs often require changes to bus depot activities to accommodate charging time and infrastructure, which can result in schedule changes and reduced asset utilisation for the operator. To gain – or improve - the range of a BEB, opportunity charging along longer routes may be required, which can impact scheduling of buses further.• With their longer range and fast refuelling time, FCEBs can be a ‘drop in’ replacement for a diesel bus and does not suffer from the infrastructure and range issues that affect the service and depot operation of BEBs.When transitioning to zero-emission buses, it is important for the operator to choose the correct technology for the specific route characteristics to ensure that the core purpose of the bus - to move passengers safely and on time - is completed without compromise.","PeriodicalId":300062,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings from the Annual Transport Conference at Aalborg University","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings from the Annual Transport Conference at Aalborg University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54337/ojs.td.v30i.7913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The bus industry has been a frontrunner in the adoption of zero emission vehicles and their operation. In 2022, zero-emission buses accounted for approximately 12.7%1 of new bus registrations in the European Union, with the uptake growing year on year. Fuel Cell Electric buses (FCEB) and Battery Electric buses (BEB) are complementary zero-emission technologies, and while both offer advantages for fleet operators, there are significant differences that can impact the choice of vehicle:• BEBs often require changes to bus depot activities to accommodate charging time and infrastructure, which can result in schedule changes and reduced asset utilisation for the operator. To gain – or improve - the range of a BEB, opportunity charging along longer routes may be required, which can impact scheduling of buses further.• With their longer range and fast refuelling time, FCEBs can be a ‘drop in’ replacement for a diesel bus and does not suffer from the infrastructure and range issues that affect the service and depot operation of BEBs.When transitioning to zero-emission buses, it is important for the operator to choose the correct technology for the specific route characteristics to ensure that the core purpose of the bus - to move passengers safely and on time - is completed without compromise.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有这么多的电池电动巴士投入使用,为什么燃料电池电动巴士比以往任何时候都更重要?
客车行业一直是采用零排放车辆及其运营的领跑者。2022年,零排放公交车约占欧盟新公交车注册量的12.7%1,这一比例逐年增长。燃料电池电动巴士(FCEB)和电池电动巴士(BEB)是互补的零排放技术,虽然两者都为车队运营商提供了优势,但两者之间存在显著差异,可能会影响车辆的选择:•BEB通常需要改变巴士站的活动,以适应充电时间和基础设施,这可能导致时间表改变,降低运营商的资产利用率。为了获得或提高电动汽车的行驶里程,可能需要在更长的路线上进行机会充电,这可能会进一步影响公交车的调度。•fceb具有更长的续航里程和更快的加油时间,可以替代柴油公交车,并且不会受到影响beb服务和仓库运行的基础设施和续航里程问题的影响。在向零排放公交车过渡的过程中,对于运营商来说,根据具体的路线特征选择正确的技术是很重要的,以确保公交车的核心目的——安全、准时地运送乘客——在不妥协的情况下完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Kan en (el-)ladcykel erstatte den ekstra bil? Erfaringer med drift af elbusser i Movia With so many battery electric buses in operation, why are fuel cell electric buses more relevant than ever? Fremtiden for lokale- og regionale jernbaner i Jylland Kortlægning af luftkvalitet og befolkningseksponering langs statsvejene i Danmark
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1