Intraoral digital radiography- A way forward or risk of overexposure: A questionnaire-based study

Rashmi Pathak, K. Samundeeswari, Jawahar Indrapriyadharshini, Narendira Sharma Ayappan, Parimala Djeapragassam, S. Srinivasan
{"title":"Intraoral digital radiography- A way forward or risk of overexposure: A questionnaire-based study","authors":"Rashmi Pathak, K. Samundeeswari, Jawahar Indrapriyadharshini, Narendira Sharma Ayappan, Parimala Djeapragassam, S. Srinivasan","doi":"10.18231/j.ijmi.2023.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Digitization of intraoral radiography has revolutionized dentistry. It comes with plethora of advantages, such as quick image production elimination of processing chemicals, reduced patient exposure. With easy and instant image acquisition, the number and frequency of radiographs as well retakes have also increased. Therefore, making us think is there an actual reduction in the radiation exposure or not.: To assess clinical utilisation of intraoral digital radiography among practicing dental surgeons.It is a questionnaire-based study. Questionnaire was curated using google forms and divided into two sections. First section included personal data and second section was focused on the clinical practice. Questionnaire link was circulated through various social media platform. 112 responses were collected.Out of all responses, 78.6% are using intraoral digital radiography, among them 53.4% are using CCD sensors. Maximum number of practitioners (54.5%) take on an average 0-5 intraoral digital radiographs and 98.9% of them take 1-6 retakes per day. Errors in positioning the receptor and PID were the most common reasons for taking repeats.: It appears that there is an increase in number and frequency of radiographs and number of retakes which might be nullifying the dose reduction from intraoral digital radiography. Practitioners should not neglect the radiation exposure from intraoral digital radiography as it may have a cumulative effect in long run and should abide by the radiation protection protocol and ALADA principle.","PeriodicalId":282949,"journal":{"name":"IP International Journal of Maxillofacial Imaging","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP International Journal of Maxillofacial Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijmi.2023.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Digitization of intraoral radiography has revolutionized dentistry. It comes with plethora of advantages, such as quick image production elimination of processing chemicals, reduced patient exposure. With easy and instant image acquisition, the number and frequency of radiographs as well retakes have also increased. Therefore, making us think is there an actual reduction in the radiation exposure or not.: To assess clinical utilisation of intraoral digital radiography among practicing dental surgeons.It is a questionnaire-based study. Questionnaire was curated using google forms and divided into two sections. First section included personal data and second section was focused on the clinical practice. Questionnaire link was circulated through various social media platform. 112 responses were collected.Out of all responses, 78.6% are using intraoral digital radiography, among them 53.4% are using CCD sensors. Maximum number of practitioners (54.5%) take on an average 0-5 intraoral digital radiographs and 98.9% of them take 1-6 retakes per day. Errors in positioning the receptor and PID were the most common reasons for taking repeats.: It appears that there is an increase in number and frequency of radiographs and number of retakes which might be nullifying the dose reduction from intraoral digital radiography. Practitioners should not neglect the radiation exposure from intraoral digital radiography as it may have a cumulative effect in long run and should abide by the radiation protection protocol and ALADA principle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口内数字放射照相-一种前进的方式或过度暴露的风险:一项基于问卷的研究
口内放射照相的数字化已经彻底改变了牙科。它具有许多优点,例如快速图像生成,消除处理化学品,减少患者暴露。由于图像采集方便快捷,x光片的数量和频率以及重拍也有所增加。因此,让我们思考辐射暴露是否真的减少了。目的:评估口腔内数字x线摄影在牙科医生中的临床应用。这是一项基于问卷的研究。问卷是用谷歌表格整理的,分为两个部分。第一部分包括个人资料,第二部分侧重于临床实践。问卷链接在各社交媒体平台上传播。收集了112份回复。在所有应答者中,78.6%使用口内数字x线摄影,其中53.4%使用CCD传感器。最多执业医师(54.5%)每日平均拍摄0-5张口内数码x线照片,其中98.9%每日重拍1-6张。受体和PID定位错误是重复服药最常见的原因。x线摄影的次数和频率以及再摄的次数似乎有所增加,这可能抵消了口内数字x线摄影所减少的剂量。从业人员不应忽视口腔内数码摄影的辐射暴露,因为它可能会产生长期累积效应,并应遵守辐射防护协议和ALADA原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Removal of osteoma from the forehead area via standard bicoronal approach, and restoration of the cavity with radiopaque bone cement polymethyl methacrylate, which is usually used to fix pathological fractures of the vertebral body Transformative frontiers in orthognathic and maxillofacial surgery through 3D printing and virtual surgical planning Surgical facelift a new horizon in science and technology: An overview and new supervene ensuing better outcomes in esthetics An unusual presentation of empty sella syndrome in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A case report Retrograde peri implantitis – A case report with literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1