Frammistöðumat á umfangsmiklum nemendateymum

Rúnar Unnþórsson, Guðmundur V. Oddsson
{"title":"Frammistöðumat á umfangsmiklum nemendateymum","authors":"Rúnar Unnþórsson, Guðmundur V. Oddsson","doi":"10.33112/ije.26.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A methodology has been developed aimed at helping teachers to evaluate the performance of extensive student teams in engineering courses. The paper demonstrates the methodology with a case study. The case is a project course that has been taught at the University of Iceland for 10 years. In the course, students design a one-seater electric race car, build it and compete in it at foreign competitions. The aim of the course each year is the same - to improve the last design. The students' performance - judged on the points received in the competitions - has been nearly the same all these years. Attempts by teachers to help the students to improve their performance have not been successful. The results show that by applying the methodology developed by the authors, teachers can get a good overview of the factors that affect students' performance and gain a good understanding of what possibly hinders progress. The methodology is a powerful tool that is easy to use to systematically analyse student performance and identify problems. The user must evaluate each factor and give a rating with arguments. This systematic approach provides a good understanding of the workings of the team, it helps to see where the problems lie and helps to decide which aspects need to be examined further. Although the methodology has been designed to evaluate student teams, all indications are that it could be useful for evaluating the performance of other teams – e.g. in industry.","PeriodicalId":280722,"journal":{"name":"Icelandic Journal of Engineering","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Icelandic Journal of Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33112/ije.26.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A methodology has been developed aimed at helping teachers to evaluate the performance of extensive student teams in engineering courses. The paper demonstrates the methodology with a case study. The case is a project course that has been taught at the University of Iceland for 10 years. In the course, students design a one-seater electric race car, build it and compete in it at foreign competitions. The aim of the course each year is the same - to improve the last design. The students' performance - judged on the points received in the competitions - has been nearly the same all these years. Attempts by teachers to help the students to improve their performance have not been successful. The results show that by applying the methodology developed by the authors, teachers can get a good overview of the factors that affect students' performance and gain a good understanding of what possibly hinders progress. The methodology is a powerful tool that is easy to use to systematically analyse student performance and identify problems. The user must evaluate each factor and give a rating with arguments. This systematic approach provides a good understanding of the workings of the team, it helps to see where the problems lie and helps to decide which aspects need to be examined further. Although the methodology has been designed to evaluate student teams, all indications are that it could be useful for evaluating the performance of other teams – e.g. in industry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
已经开发了一种方法,旨在帮助教师评估工程课程中广泛的学生团队的表现。本文通过一个案例分析来论证该方法。这个案例是一门在冰岛大学已经教授了10年的项目课程。在这门课程中,学生们设计了一辆单座电动赛车,将其制造出来并参加国外的比赛。每年课程的目标都是一样的——改进最后的设计。这些年来,学生们的表现——以比赛得分来评判——几乎没有变化。老师们帮助学生提高成绩的尝试并没有成功。结果表明,通过应用作者开发的方法,教师可以很好地了解影响学生表现的因素,并很好地了解可能阻碍进步的因素。该方法是一个强大的工具,易于系统地分析学生的表现和发现问题。用户必须评估每个因素,并给出一个带有参数的评级。这种系统化的方法提供了对团队工作的良好理解,它有助于发现问题所在,并有助于决定需要进一步检查哪些方面。虽然该方法是为评估学生团队而设计的,但所有迹象表明,它也可用于评估其他团队的表现,例如在工业中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Starfsumhverfi og helstu aðferðir íslenskra verkefnastjóra Life Cycle Assessment of Icelandic-Type Berm Breakwater Sjálfakandi ökutæki á Íslandi: Viðhorf almennings gagnvart nýjum ferðamáta Frammistöðumat á umfangsmiklum nemendateymum Ísland í dag - Nærri tveimur áratugum síðar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1