Functional verification of complete sequential behaviors: A formal treatment of discrepancies between system-level and RTL descriptions

Carlos Ivan Castro Marquez, M. Strum, J. Wang
{"title":"Functional verification of complete sequential behaviors: A formal treatment of discrepancies between system-level and RTL descriptions","authors":"Carlos Ivan Castro Marquez, M. Strum, J. Wang","doi":"10.1109/IDT.2013.6727074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Formal techniques allow exhaustive verification on circuit design (at least in theory), but due to actual computational limitations, workarounds must always be adopted to check only a portion of the design at a time. Sequential equivalence checking is an effective approach, but it can only be applied between circuit descriptions where a one-to-one correspondence for states, as well as for memory elements, is expected. This paper presents a formal methodology to verify RTL descriptions through direct comparison with high-level reference models. By doing so, there is no need to specify or analyze formal properties, as the complete behavior is already contained in the reference model. We also consider the natural discrepancies between system level and RTL code, including non-matching interface and memory elements, and state mapping. In this manner, we are able to prove the functional coherence for the overall sequential behavior of the design under verification.","PeriodicalId":446826,"journal":{"name":"2013 8th IEEE Design and Test Symposium","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 8th IEEE Design and Test Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IDT.2013.6727074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Formal techniques allow exhaustive verification on circuit design (at least in theory), but due to actual computational limitations, workarounds must always be adopted to check only a portion of the design at a time. Sequential equivalence checking is an effective approach, but it can only be applied between circuit descriptions where a one-to-one correspondence for states, as well as for memory elements, is expected. This paper presents a formal methodology to verify RTL descriptions through direct comparison with high-level reference models. By doing so, there is no need to specify or analyze formal properties, as the complete behavior is already contained in the reference model. We also consider the natural discrepancies between system level and RTL code, including non-matching interface and memory elements, and state mapping. In this manner, we are able to prove the functional coherence for the overall sequential behavior of the design under verification.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
完整顺序行为的功能验证:对系统级和RTL描述之间差异的正式处理
正式技术允许对电路设计进行详尽的验证(至少在理论上),但由于实际的计算限制,必须始终采用变通方法,一次只能检查设计的一部分。顺序等效性检查是一种有效的方法,但它只能应用于电路描述之间,其中状态和存储元素的一对一对应是预期的。本文提出了一种通过与高级参考模型直接比较来验证RTL描述的形式化方法。通过这样做,就不需要指定或分析形式属性,因为完整的行为已经包含在参考模型中。我们还考虑了系统级和RTL代码之间的自然差异,包括不匹配的接口和内存元素,以及状态映射。通过这种方式,我们能够证明在验证下设计的整体顺序行为的功能一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assertion based on-line fault detection applied on UHF RFID tag Evaluation of the angle of arrival based techniques Novel designs of digital detection analyzer for intelligent detection and analysis in digital microfluidic biochips Systolic architecture for hardware implementation of two-dimensional non-separable filter-bank Compilation optimization exploration for thermal dissipation reduction in embedded systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1