A Transition from Historical Method to Historical-Cultural Contents Approach

Byeong-Jun You
{"title":"A Transition from Historical Method to Historical-Cultural Contents Approach","authors":"Byeong-Jun You","doi":"10.56659/kcsc.2023.07.3.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to explore the contemporary meaning of the historical-cultural contents area. To this end, discussions were conducted to understand historical-cultural contents as a way to deal with various pasts beyond recognizing them in the realm of existing historical studies. Specifically, it pointed out that the existing methodology of history is focused on ensuring objectivity, and paid attention to the problem of “sympathy” that occurs at this time. Since then, the meaning of historical-cultural contents has been examined through content and formal dimensions, that is, 'faction' and 'historytelling'. As a result of the discussion, historical-cultural contents can deal with various pasts as a faction. This makes it possible to deal with the past of the 'gap' that exists between 'real facts' and 'historical facts'. In addition, through historytelling, various communications are made in relationships such as “historian and the public,” “public and the public,” and “past and the public,” rather than “one-sided conversations with historians.” In summary, historical-cultural contents provide various ways to remember the past in addition to the aspects of “utilization” and “activation measures” as an extension of existing historical studies. Therefore, it is necessary to understand historical-cultural contents as a way to deal with the past anew beyond looking at them from the perspective of scientific and historical history. Through this, the past can be (re)processed in more various ways.","PeriodicalId":127578,"journal":{"name":"K-Culture·Story Contents Reasearch Institute","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"K-Culture·Story Contents Reasearch Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56659/kcsc.2023.07.3.111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the contemporary meaning of the historical-cultural contents area. To this end, discussions were conducted to understand historical-cultural contents as a way to deal with various pasts beyond recognizing them in the realm of existing historical studies. Specifically, it pointed out that the existing methodology of history is focused on ensuring objectivity, and paid attention to the problem of “sympathy” that occurs at this time. Since then, the meaning of historical-cultural contents has been examined through content and formal dimensions, that is, 'faction' and 'historytelling'. As a result of the discussion, historical-cultural contents can deal with various pasts as a faction. This makes it possible to deal with the past of the 'gap' that exists between 'real facts' and 'historical facts'. In addition, through historytelling, various communications are made in relationships such as “historian and the public,” “public and the public,” and “past and the public,” rather than “one-sided conversations with historians.” In summary, historical-cultural contents provide various ways to remember the past in addition to the aspects of “utilization” and “activation measures” as an extension of existing historical studies. Therefore, it is necessary to understand historical-cultural contents as a way to deal with the past anew beyond looking at them from the perspective of scientific and historical history. Through this, the past can be (re)processed in more various ways.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从历史方法到历史文化内容方法的过渡
本研究旨在探讨历史文化内容区的当代意义。为此,讨论了超越现有历史研究领域的认识,将历史文化内容理解为处理各种过去的方法。具体地说,它指出现有的历史研究方法论侧重于保证客观性,并关注此时发生的“同情”问题。从那时起,历史文化内容的意义就通过内容和形式维度,即“派系”和“讲历史”来考察。因此,历史文化内容可以作为一个派别来处理各种过去。这使得处理过去存在于“真实事实”和“历史事实”之间的“鸿沟”成为可能。此外,通过讲述历史,在“历史学家与公众”、“公众与公众”、“过去与公众”等关系中进行各种交流,而不是“与历史学家的单方面对话”。综上所述,历史文化内容作为既有历史研究的延伸,除了“利用”和“激活措施”方面,还提供了多种记忆过去的方式。因此,有必要超越从科学史和历史史的角度看待历史文化内容,作为重新处理过去的一种方式。通过这种方式,过去可以以更多种方式被(重新)处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A study on the cultural content of local cultural resources in Daeya-dong: Gunpo-si - Focusing on and follow-up work A Transition from Historical Method to Historical-Cultural Contents Approach Can the Japanese Military ‘Comfort Women’ speak in English?: Americanization of the ‘Comfort Women’ issue and The Politics of Representation of “I Can Speak” A Study on Text Expansion and Semantic System in ChineseA Study on Text Expansion and Semantic System in Chinese and Korean Film Adaptation Cases: Focusing on Zeng GuoXiang’s film and Min Yong-geun's film ASMR contents through trigger: Focusing on the cases of ASMR YouTube in Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1