Paternal Relationships With Sons and Daughters

Lambrianos Nikiforidis
{"title":"Paternal Relationships With Sons and Daughters","authors":"Lambrianos Nikiforidis","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190674687.013.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines paternal relationships with sons and daughters. Identity drives investment (and parental investment in particular), because people invest in that which aligns with their identity. And biological sex drives identity. These two ideas combined imply that a parent-offspring match in biological sex can influence parental favoritism in a systematic manner, an idea supported by recent empirical studies. This parental bias of concordant-sex favoritism can have broad implications, outside the context of the traditional family structure. In single parent or same-sex parent households, the consequences of this bias can be even stronger, because there would not be an opposite-direction bias from the other parent to even things out. This favoritism could have even broader ramifications, entirely outside the context of the family. On the one hand, whenever social norms dictate that men should control a family’s financial decisions, then sons may systematically receive more resources than daughters. This asymmetry in investment would then result in ever-increasing advantages that persist over time. On the other hand, if women are a family’s primary shoppers, this can manifest in subtle but chronic favoritism for daughters.","PeriodicalId":118977,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology and Parenting","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology and Parenting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190674687.013.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter examines paternal relationships with sons and daughters. Identity drives investment (and parental investment in particular), because people invest in that which aligns with their identity. And biological sex drives identity. These two ideas combined imply that a parent-offspring match in biological sex can influence parental favoritism in a systematic manner, an idea supported by recent empirical studies. This parental bias of concordant-sex favoritism can have broad implications, outside the context of the traditional family structure. In single parent or same-sex parent households, the consequences of this bias can be even stronger, because there would not be an opposite-direction bias from the other parent to even things out. This favoritism could have even broader ramifications, entirely outside the context of the family. On the one hand, whenever social norms dictate that men should control a family’s financial decisions, then sons may systematically receive more resources than daughters. This asymmetry in investment would then result in ever-increasing advantages that persist over time. On the other hand, if women are a family’s primary shoppers, this can manifest in subtle but chronic favoritism for daughters.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父亲与子女的关系
本章探讨父亲与儿子和女儿的关系。身份驱动投资(尤其是亲代投资),因为人们会投资与自己身份相符的东西。而生理性别驱动着身份认同。这两种观点结合在一起意味着,父母-后代在生理性别上的匹配会以一种系统的方式影响父母的偏爱,这一观点得到了最近实证研究的支持。在传统家庭结构的背景之外,父母对和谐性偏爱的偏见可能会产生广泛的影响。在单亲家庭或同性家庭中,这种偏见的后果可能会更严重,因为父母中的另一方不会有相反方向的偏见来平衡事情。这种偏爱可能会产生更广泛的影响,完全超出家庭的范围。一方面,每当社会规范规定男性应该控制家庭的财务决策时,儿子可能会系统性地比女儿获得更多的资源。这种投资的不对称将导致优势不断增加,并随着时间的推移而持续存在。另一方面,如果女性是一个家庭的主要购物者,这可能会表现为对女儿的微妙但长期的偏爱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Aunts and Uncles Cultural Perspectives on Parenting The Effects of Maternal Prenatal Stress on Fetal and Child Development Maternal Aggression Paternal Relationships With Sons and Daughters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1