Zionism and Contemporary Christianity in the Public Square

Ilan Troen
{"title":"Zionism and Contemporary Christianity in the Public Square","authors":"Ilan Troen","doi":"10.1080/25785648.2022.2156572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This essay brings together observations regarding the struggle over the Holy Land in the context of Saul Friedländer’s interests in Zionism, the role of memory in history, and the Holocaust. History and collective memory remain fundamental to the way claims have been made to the Holy Land. Jewish control over Mandatory Palestine has often been challenged in established monotheistic theology, particularly Christian supersessionism. Like other nationalisms, Zionism is supported by historical narratives framed in secular terms. Thus, arguments that support a Jewish state and those that deny its legitimacy have recourse to historical narratives. With the disposition of the Ottoman Empire largely determined by the Christian West, European antisemitism and the Holocaust proved of singular importance in the ongoing theological and ideological arguments for establishing a secure refuge for Jews. Moreover, the essay demonstrates that these discourses are not necessarily separate, but rather often overlap and complement one another. In the course of this examination, the essay references selected strands of contemporary Christianity: Catholicism, Evangelicalism, Mainline Protestantism, and Palestinian Liberation Theology. While accounting for antisemitism and the Holocaust once seemed to promise change in some established dogmas, it remains to be seen how significantly and permanently it has occasioned the hoped-for reevaluation of the Jews’ role in history given the extent and depth of supersessionist thought when also supported by ostensibly secular political categories.","PeriodicalId":422357,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2022.2156572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This essay brings together observations regarding the struggle over the Holy Land in the context of Saul Friedländer’s interests in Zionism, the role of memory in history, and the Holocaust. History and collective memory remain fundamental to the way claims have been made to the Holy Land. Jewish control over Mandatory Palestine has often been challenged in established monotheistic theology, particularly Christian supersessionism. Like other nationalisms, Zionism is supported by historical narratives framed in secular terms. Thus, arguments that support a Jewish state and those that deny its legitimacy have recourse to historical narratives. With the disposition of the Ottoman Empire largely determined by the Christian West, European antisemitism and the Holocaust proved of singular importance in the ongoing theological and ideological arguments for establishing a secure refuge for Jews. Moreover, the essay demonstrates that these discourses are not necessarily separate, but rather often overlap and complement one another. In the course of this examination, the essay references selected strands of contemporary Christianity: Catholicism, Evangelicalism, Mainline Protestantism, and Palestinian Liberation Theology. While accounting for antisemitism and the Holocaust once seemed to promise change in some established dogmas, it remains to be seen how significantly and permanently it has occasioned the hoped-for reevaluation of the Jews’ role in history given the extent and depth of supersessionist thought when also supported by ostensibly secular political categories.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共广场上的犹太复国主义和当代基督教
这篇文章汇集了在扫罗Friedländer对犹太复国主义的兴趣,记忆在历史中的作用和大屠杀的背景下对圣地的斗争的观察。历史和集体记忆仍然是对圣地提出主权要求的根本原因。犹太人对巴勒斯坦的控制经常受到一神论神学的挑战,尤其是基督教的取代主义。和其他民族主义一样,犹太复国主义得到了世俗语境下的历史叙事的支持。因此,支持犹太国家和否认其合法性的论点都诉诸于历史叙述。由于奥斯曼帝国的地位在很大程度上取决于基督教西方,欧洲的反犹主义和大屠杀在为犹太人建立安全避难所的神学和意识形态争论中证明了其独特的重要性。此外,本文还表明,这些话语并不一定是分开的,而是经常重叠和互补。在这次考试的过程中,论文参考了当代基督教的精选股:天主教,福音派,主流新教,和巴勒斯坦解放神学。虽然对反犹主义和大屠杀的解释一度似乎有望改变一些既定的教条,但鉴于取代主义思想的广度和深度,在表面上也得到世俗政治类别的支持的情况下,它对犹太人在历史上的角色的重新评估有多么重要和持久,还有待观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Where Art Met History: Holocaust Exhibitions in Early Postwar Hungary ‘Because They Were Jews!’ The Postwar Artworks of David Friedmann as Eyewitness Testimonies Whose Barbarianism? Exhibiting Antifascism, the Resistance, and the Holocaust in Postwar Italy and Now “Lest We Forget”: Bringing Atrocity Home Through Large Photomurals Artists Behind Barbed Wire: Art Exhibitions in the Detention Camps in Cyprus, 1947–1948
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1