“Lest We Forget”: Bringing Atrocity Home Through Large Photomurals

Rebecca Frank
{"title":"“Lest We Forget”: Bringing Atrocity Home Through Large Photomurals","authors":"Rebecca Frank","doi":"10.1080/25785648.2023.2209418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The ‘Lest We Forget’ exhibition opened on Memorial Day, May 30, 1945, just over a month after the liberation of the Bergen-Belsen and Dachau concentration camps where many of the photos were shot. Twenty-five enlarged atrocity photomurals, ranging up to 12 feet high and 19 feet wide, were hung in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch building’s mechanical annex. Over the course of three and a half weeks, 80,413 people visited the exhibition in St. Louis, Missouri. The exhibition then traveled the US in the summer of 1945, including stops in Boston, Detroit, and the Library of Congress in Washington, DC. The ‘Lest We Forget’ exhibition used the photomural medium to share the atrocities that Americans read about and saw small photographs of in newspapers in a new way. While photomurals were widespread in the decades leading up to the exhibition, photomurals of atrocity photographs were uncommon. Did the scale of the photomurals affect the experience of viewing atrocity images? What did American politicians think of the exhibition and how it could impact public opinion? How did visitors react to the exhibition throughout the US? Were there similar exhibitions abroad? My article deals with these questions by piecing together sources ranging from newspaper articles to exhibition photographs and a government speaker draft. Starting with the exhibition’s visual landscape and an analysis of the photomurals’ scale, this article then turns to the American government and civilian experience, before closing with an analysis of the London exhibition and publication. By sharing large-scale atrocity photomurals in a collective setting, the ‘Lest We Forget’ exhibition evoked new, emotional reactions from visitors.","PeriodicalId":422357,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2023.2209418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The ‘Lest We Forget’ exhibition opened on Memorial Day, May 30, 1945, just over a month after the liberation of the Bergen-Belsen and Dachau concentration camps where many of the photos were shot. Twenty-five enlarged atrocity photomurals, ranging up to 12 feet high and 19 feet wide, were hung in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch building’s mechanical annex. Over the course of three and a half weeks, 80,413 people visited the exhibition in St. Louis, Missouri. The exhibition then traveled the US in the summer of 1945, including stops in Boston, Detroit, and the Library of Congress in Washington, DC. The ‘Lest We Forget’ exhibition used the photomural medium to share the atrocities that Americans read about and saw small photographs of in newspapers in a new way. While photomurals were widespread in the decades leading up to the exhibition, photomurals of atrocity photographs were uncommon. Did the scale of the photomurals affect the experience of viewing atrocity images? What did American politicians think of the exhibition and how it could impact public opinion? How did visitors react to the exhibition throughout the US? Were there similar exhibitions abroad? My article deals with these questions by piecing together sources ranging from newspaper articles to exhibition photographs and a government speaker draft. Starting with the exhibition’s visual landscape and an analysis of the photomurals’ scale, this article then turns to the American government and civilian experience, before closing with an analysis of the London exhibition and publication. By sharing large-scale atrocity photomurals in a collective setting, the ‘Lest We Forget’ exhibition evoked new, emotional reactions from visitors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“以免我们忘记”:通过大型壁画将暴行带回家
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Where Art Met History: Holocaust Exhibitions in Early Postwar Hungary ‘Because They Were Jews!’ The Postwar Artworks of David Friedmann as Eyewitness Testimonies Whose Barbarianism? Exhibiting Antifascism, the Resistance, and the Holocaust in Postwar Italy and Now “Lest We Forget”: Bringing Atrocity Home Through Large Photomurals Artists Behind Barbed Wire: Art Exhibitions in the Detention Camps in Cyprus, 1947–1948
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1