Development and Evaluation of the Windows Computer Experience Questionnaire (WCEQ)

L. A. Miller, K. Stanney, William Wooten
{"title":"Development and Evaluation of the Windows Computer Experience Questionnaire (WCEQ)","authors":"L. A. Miller, K. Stanney, William Wooten","doi":"10.1207/s15327590ijhc0903_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The software market has been inundated with Windows-based application programs claiming increased usability and convenience. Although this trend is indeed prolific, it has resulted in two important implications: (a) an increase in the need to select employees with high levels of Windows-based computer expertise or to identify current employees who require enhanced training, and (b) an increase in the need to measure user expertise to support human-computer interaction research. Despite these increasing demands, questionnaires used to determine general computer experience are scarce. Furthermore, questionnaires regarding computer experience in a Windows environment are seemingly nonexistent. A reliable means of measuring experience in a Windows environment could substantially facilitate both human-computer interaction research and training. This article describes the procedures used to develop and test the reliability of the Windows Computer Experience Questionnaire (WCEQ). A test-retest correlation reveal...","PeriodicalId":208962,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc0903_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The software market has been inundated with Windows-based application programs claiming increased usability and convenience. Although this trend is indeed prolific, it has resulted in two important implications: (a) an increase in the need to select employees with high levels of Windows-based computer expertise or to identify current employees who require enhanced training, and (b) an increase in the need to measure user expertise to support human-computer interaction research. Despite these increasing demands, questionnaires used to determine general computer experience are scarce. Furthermore, questionnaires regarding computer experience in a Windows environment are seemingly nonexistent. A reliable means of measuring experience in a Windows environment could substantially facilitate both human-computer interaction research and training. This article describes the procedures used to develop and test the reliability of the Windows Computer Experience Questionnaire (WCEQ). A test-retest correlation reveal...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
windowscomputer Experience Questionnaire (WCEQ)的开发与评价
软件市场已经充斥着基于windows的应用程序,这些程序声称提高了可用性和便利性。虽然这一趋势确实是多产的,但它导致了两个重要的影响:(a)选择具有高水平基于windows的计算机专业知识的员工或确定需要加强培训的现有员工的需求增加,以及(b)测量用户专业知识以支持人机交互研究的需求增加。尽管需求不断增加,但用于确定一般计算机体验的问卷却很少。此外,关于Windows环境下的计算机体验的调查问卷似乎不存在。在Windows环境中测量体验的可靠方法可以极大地促进人机交互研究和培训。本文描述了用于开发和测试Windows计算机体验问卷(WCEQ)可靠性的程序。一项测试-重测相关性显示…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Usability Inspection by Metaphors of Human Thinking Compared to Heuristic Evaluation Templates for Search Queries: A User-Centered Feature for Improving Web Search Tools A Corporate Style Guide That Includes Domain Knowledge Identification of an Acceptable Mixture of Key and Speech Inputs in Bimodal Interfaces Decision Support for Indexing and Retrieval of Information in Hypertext Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1