Sensory Substitution and Augmentation: An Introduction

F. Macpherson
{"title":"Sensory Substitution and Augmentation: An Introduction","authors":"F. Macpherson","doi":"10.5871/bacad/9780197266441.003.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay I outline the main questions and the debates about sensory substitution and augmentation devices. I describe the two most studied modern sensory substitution devices (TVSS and the vOICe) and one sensory augmentation device (the feelSpace belt). I discuss whether use of these devices gives rise to new sensory experiences of objects or just new perceptual judgements about objects. Then, on the assumption that new sensory experiences are being had, I consider what sensory modality is operative—the substituted or the substituting one, or another altogether. I examine the evidence concerning whether the experiences had in sensory substitution are of a two- or a three-dimensional world, and about the nature of those experiences with respect to whether colour is represented in them. I consider whether there are any limits to what information or what experiences can be given via sensory substitution. And I discuss whether the results from sensory substitution experiments can be used to support certain theories of perception at the expense of rivals. Furthermore, the practical use of sensory substitution and augmentation devices is considered. Finally, I provide a brief overview of the rest of the essays that this volume contains and the host of further interesting issues that the authors consider and address.","PeriodicalId":415104,"journal":{"name":"Sensory Substitution and Augmentation","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sensory Substitution and Augmentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197266441.003.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In this essay I outline the main questions and the debates about sensory substitution and augmentation devices. I describe the two most studied modern sensory substitution devices (TVSS and the vOICe) and one sensory augmentation device (the feelSpace belt). I discuss whether use of these devices gives rise to new sensory experiences of objects or just new perceptual judgements about objects. Then, on the assumption that new sensory experiences are being had, I consider what sensory modality is operative—the substituted or the substituting one, or another altogether. I examine the evidence concerning whether the experiences had in sensory substitution are of a two- or a three-dimensional world, and about the nature of those experiences with respect to whether colour is represented in them. I consider whether there are any limits to what information or what experiences can be given via sensory substitution. And I discuss whether the results from sensory substitution experiments can be used to support certain theories of perception at the expense of rivals. Furthermore, the practical use of sensory substitution and augmentation devices is considered. Finally, I provide a brief overview of the rest of the essays that this volume contains and the host of further interesting issues that the authors consider and address.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感官替代与增强:导论
在这篇文章中,我概述了关于感官替代和增强装置的主要问题和争论。我描述了两种研究最多的现代感官替代装置(TVSS和vOICe)和一种感官增强装置(feelSpace腰带)。我讨论了这些设备的使用是否会产生对物体的新的感官体验,或者仅仅是对物体的新的感知判断。然后,在有新的感官体验的假设下,我考虑什么样的感官形态是有效的——是替代的还是替代的,还是完全替代的。我研究了关于感官替代中的经验是二维还是三维世界的证据,以及关于这些经验的本质,即颜色是否在其中被表征。我考虑通过感官替代所能提供的信息或体验是否存在限制。我还讨论了感官替代实验的结果是否可以用来支持某些以牺牲对手为代价的感知理论。此外,还考虑了感官替代和增强装置的实际应用。最后,我提供了本卷包含的其他文章的简要概述,以及作者考虑和解决的进一步有趣问题的主机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Limits of the Classical Functionalist Perspective on Sensory Substitution Rewired Animals and Sensory Substitution: The Cause Is Not Cortical Plasticity The Role of Noetic Feelings in Sensory Substitution What Can Sensory Substitution Tell Us about the Organization of the Brain? The Processing of What, Where, and How
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1