{"title":"Specialists in Magic","authors":"","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501750649.003.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter highlights three witchcraft trials in which the sources offer compelling evidence that the accused parties actually practiced some kind of magical work: healing and cursing; protecting crops by untying knots in grain; and identifying criminals through divination. These three instances of magical practitioners at work come from the seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth centuries, respectively: two are from the Ukrainian region, and one is from the Russian North. They were heard in a range of secular and religious courts and by representatives of local and central administrations. Across the three, similar issues surface. The authorities and the accused in their statements expressed concern about whether or not the practitioners accepted payment for the work and about how they learned or received their skills. In each case, there remains little question that the accused did practice some form of magic and did so with enough frequency and publicity to qualify as “professionals” (in a loose sense of the word), whether or not they identified themselves as witches. Whether they deserved the torture and harsh punishments they often received, at least into the mid-eighteenth century, is, of course, a very different kind of question.","PeriodicalId":141287,"journal":{"name":"Witchcraft in Russia and Ukraine, 1000-1900","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Witchcraft in Russia and Ukraine, 1000-1900","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501750649.003.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter highlights three witchcraft trials in which the sources offer compelling evidence that the accused parties actually practiced some kind of magical work: healing and cursing; protecting crops by untying knots in grain; and identifying criminals through divination. These three instances of magical practitioners at work come from the seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth centuries, respectively: two are from the Ukrainian region, and one is from the Russian North. They were heard in a range of secular and religious courts and by representatives of local and central administrations. Across the three, similar issues surface. The authorities and the accused in their statements expressed concern about whether or not the practitioners accepted payment for the work and about how they learned or received their skills. In each case, there remains little question that the accused did practice some form of magic and did so with enough frequency and publicity to qualify as “professionals” (in a loose sense of the word), whether or not they identified themselves as witches. Whether they deserved the torture and harsh punishments they often received, at least into the mid-eighteenth century, is, of course, a very different kind of question.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
魔法专家
本章重点介绍了三起巫术审判,在这些审判中,资料来源提供了令人信服的证据,证明被告实际上使用了某种魔法:治疗和诅咒;通过解开谷物上的结来保护作物;通过占卜来识别罪犯。这三个例子分别来自十七世纪、十八世纪和十九世纪:两个来自乌克兰地区,一个来自俄罗斯北部。各种世俗和宗教法庭以及地方和中央行政机关的代表都听取了他们的意见。在这三个国家,类似的问题浮出水面。当局和被告在他们的陈述中对从业人员是否接受报酬以及他们如何学习或获得技能表示关切。在每一个案例中,毋庸置疑的是,被告确实练习了某种形式的魔法,而且这样做的频率和宣传都足够高,足以使他们有资格成为“专业人士”(这个词的宽泛意义),无论他们是否认为自己是女巫。至少在18世纪中期,他们是否应该受到酷刑和严厉的惩罚,当然是另一个问题了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Satanic Pacts/Diabolism Early Accounts of Witchcraft, Sorcery, and Magic in Medieval Rus Witchcraft Trials’ Processes and Extralegal Prosecution of Witchcraft Laws and Guidelines concerning the Prosecution of Witchcraft, Late Twelfth Century to 1885 Specialists in Magic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1