Model of Development of Teacher’s Readiness to Work for Inclusive Education

I. Sadova, O. Kravchenko-Dzondza
{"title":"Model of Development of Teacher’s Readiness to Work for Inclusive Education","authors":"I. Sadova, O. Kravchenko-Dzondza","doi":"10.2991/AEBMR.K.210320.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study was conducted to create a model of development of teacher’s readiness to work for inclusive education in general secondary education. This model consists of four blocks: 1) a conceptual one (defines methodological approaches and principles); 2) a semantic one (provides a set of knowledge, skills and competencies that are acquired, developed and mastered in higher education, as well as in non-formal and informal education; it provides development of a system of methodological, theoretical, practical and technological knowledge, along with design, gnostic, organizational, communicative, control and assesment skills); 3) a procedural one (is considered to be a pedagogical system which includes diagnostic, motivational, activating and analytical stages, along with a set of forms, methods, technologies and teaching aids); 4) an effective one (determines the success of the model on the basis of scientifically sound criteria and corresponding indicators of teacher’s readiness to work for inclusive education). The effectiveness of this model has been tested on the basis of the center for postgraduate education and pre-university training at Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University. The data of a final section of a quantitative distribution of the teachers (in %) by the levels of their readiness to work for inclusive education according to the criteria of motivational, valuable, cognitive, activating, emotional, volitional and reflexive components confirm the effectiveness of this model.","PeriodicalId":132554,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Economics, Law and Education Research (ELER 2021)","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Economics, Law and Education Research (ELER 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/AEBMR.K.210320.046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study was conducted to create a model of development of teacher’s readiness to work for inclusive education in general secondary education. This model consists of four blocks: 1) a conceptual one (defines methodological approaches and principles); 2) a semantic one (provides a set of knowledge, skills and competencies that are acquired, developed and mastered in higher education, as well as in non-formal and informal education; it provides development of a system of methodological, theoretical, practical and technological knowledge, along with design, gnostic, organizational, communicative, control and assesment skills); 3) a procedural one (is considered to be a pedagogical system which includes diagnostic, motivational, activating and analytical stages, along with a set of forms, methods, technologies and teaching aids); 4) an effective one (determines the success of the model on the basis of scientifically sound criteria and corresponding indicators of teacher’s readiness to work for inclusive education). The effectiveness of this model has been tested on the basis of the center for postgraduate education and pre-university training at Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University. The data of a final section of a quantitative distribution of the teachers (in %) by the levels of their readiness to work for inclusive education according to the criteria of motivational, valuable, cognitive, activating, emotional, volitional and reflexive components confirm the effectiveness of this model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向全纳教育的教师工作准备发展模式
本研究旨在建立一个普通中等教育中教师工作准备发展的模型。该模型由四个部分组成:1)概念部分(定义方法方法和原则);2)语义(提供在高等教育以及非正规和非正式教育中获得、发展和掌握的一套知识、技能和能力;它提供了方法论、理论、实践和技术知识体系的发展,以及设计、灵知、组织、沟通、控制和评估技能);3)程序性(被认为是一个教学系统,包括诊断、激励、激活和分析阶段,以及一套形式、方法、技术和教学辅助工具);4)有效的模式(基于科学合理的标准和教师为全纳教育工作的准备程度的相应指标来决定模式的成功)。在德罗霍比奇伊万·弗兰科国立师范大学研究生教育和大学预科培训中心的基础上,对这一模式的有效性进行了测试。根据动机、价值、认知、激活、情感、意志和反射成分的标准,对教师准备为全纳教育工作的水平进行定量分布的最后一部分数据(以%为单位)证实了该模型的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of Socio-Professional Activity of Personality in Conditions of Distance Education During Covid-19 Pandemic Technologies of Distance Learning for Teaching Primary School Subjects of During the COVID-19 Pandemic Formation of Students’ Methodological Culture in Vocal Training at University Justice in Pedagogical Interactions as a Factor of Mental Health of Participants in Educational Process of Participants in Educational Process The Current State of the Investment Environment in Ukraine and its Impact on the Investment Security of the State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1