Corporate Law Reform and Political Environment: An Empirical Analysis Employing Public Comment Procedure Data in Japan

Hatsuru Morita
{"title":"Corporate Law Reform and Political Environment: An Empirical Analysis Employing Public Comment Procedure Data in Japan","authors":"Hatsuru Morita","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2394451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corporate law shapes the fundamental business environment and affects various stakeholders such as shareholders, managers, employees, and creditors. Each stakeholder has an incentive to influence the reform process of corporate law. The many corporate law reforms in Japan reflect its rapidly changing business environment. It is possible to determine the behaviour of various stakeholders by examining the politics of the reform process of corporate law.In order to understand the corporate law reform process, this paper uses the notice-and-comment procedure (`public comment procedure'), which was introduced by the Administrative Procedure Act in 1993. The Administrative Procedure Act requires every law reform or order proposed by a government agency to undergo a public comment procedure. Under this procedure, people submit comments to the Ministry of Justice; some of these comments are reflected in the final bill, whereas others are not. The paper performs a quantitative analysis of a hand-collected dataset from two recent public comment procedures on corporate law reform. By analysing the comments with respect to the issues, we can understand the mechanism of the corporate law reform process, particularly the relative political power of various interest groups.The results showed that the bureaucrats are rigid and not willing to take public comments seriously. However, on some technical issues, legal academics and legal professionals, such as courts and law firms, influence the behaviour of the bureaucrats. The results showed that the bureaucrats employed these comments to honour the technical views of professionals. In other cases, corporate managers significantly influence the reform process. The results did not support Croley's (2007) independence hypothesis about government agencies.","PeriodicalId":251521,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Legislative & Political Process (Topic)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Legislative & Political Process (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2394451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Corporate law shapes the fundamental business environment and affects various stakeholders such as shareholders, managers, employees, and creditors. Each stakeholder has an incentive to influence the reform process of corporate law. The many corporate law reforms in Japan reflect its rapidly changing business environment. It is possible to determine the behaviour of various stakeholders by examining the politics of the reform process of corporate law.In order to understand the corporate law reform process, this paper uses the notice-and-comment procedure (`public comment procedure'), which was introduced by the Administrative Procedure Act in 1993. The Administrative Procedure Act requires every law reform or order proposed by a government agency to undergo a public comment procedure. Under this procedure, people submit comments to the Ministry of Justice; some of these comments are reflected in the final bill, whereas others are not. The paper performs a quantitative analysis of a hand-collected dataset from two recent public comment procedures on corporate law reform. By analysing the comments with respect to the issues, we can understand the mechanism of the corporate law reform process, particularly the relative political power of various interest groups.The results showed that the bureaucrats are rigid and not willing to take public comments seriously. However, on some technical issues, legal academics and legal professionals, such as courts and law firms, influence the behaviour of the bureaucrats. The results showed that the bureaucrats employed these comments to honour the technical views of professionals. In other cases, corporate managers significantly influence the reform process. The results did not support Croley's (2007) independence hypothesis about government agencies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公司法改革与政治环境:基于日本公众意见程序数据的实证分析
公司法塑造了基本的商业环境,并影响到各种利益相关者,如股东、经理、员工和债权人。每个利益相关者都有影响公司法改革进程的动机。日本的许多公司法改革反映了其快速变化的商业环境。通过考察公司法改革过程中的政治因素,可以确定不同利益相关者的行为。为了了解公司法改革的过程,本文使用了1993年《行政程序法》引入的通知和评论程序(“公众评论程序”)。《行政程序法》规定,政府机关提出的每一项法律改革或命令都必须经过公众评论程序。根据这一程序,人们向司法部提交意见;其中一些评论反映在最终法案中,而另一些则没有。本文对最近两次公司法改革公众评论程序中手工收集的数据集进行了定量分析。通过分析对这些问题的评论,我们可以了解公司法改革进程的机制,特别是各利益集团的相对政治权力。结果表明,官僚作风僵化,不愿认真对待公众意见。然而,在一些技术问题上,法律学者和法律专业人士,如法院和律师事务所,会影响官僚的行为。结果表明,官僚们利用这些评论来尊重专业人士的技术观点。在其他情况下,公司经理对改革进程有重大影响。研究结果不支持Croley(2007)关于政府机构的独立性假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How to Govern Conduct RegData: Australia An Assessment of Factors Important to Legislators in Budget Decisions; How Much Impact Can Agencies Have? Statutory Design as Policy Analysis Political Corruption and Legislative Complexity: A Macroeconomic Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1