{"title":"RegData: Australia","authors":"P. McLaughlin, Oliver Sherouse, J. Potts","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3420352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we introduce RegData Australia (RDAU1.0) and present some preliminary and comparative findings using this new panel. RDAU1.0 applies the RegData method to create a unique Australian database that extends from 1997 to 2012. RegData uses text analysis to quantify restrictive clauses in legislation, significantly improving the accuracy of measurements of regulatory incidence. RDAU1.0 extends and adapts the RegData methodology to Australian regulations and legislation. We use RDAU1.0 to capture broad patterns in Australian regulation, and we compare these data to RegData findings from other regulatory jurisdictions, including the federal government in the United States and several US state governments. A preliminary analysis yields relational evidence consistent with previous researchers’ hypothesis that the extent of regulation will be determined by the size of the market because of the fixed costs of regulatory production. This hypothesis suggests that regulatory volume in a specific jurisdiction will scale as a function of the jurisdiction’s population. We examine RegData metrics of regulation for 23 different jurisdictions, including the federal governments of Australia and the United States and the state governments of 21 American states, and find a positive and significant correlation between regulatory volume and population.","PeriodicalId":251521,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Legislative & Political Process (Topic)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Legislative & Political Process (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3420352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
In this paper we introduce RegData Australia (RDAU1.0) and present some preliminary and comparative findings using this new panel. RDAU1.0 applies the RegData method to create a unique Australian database that extends from 1997 to 2012. RegData uses text analysis to quantify restrictive clauses in legislation, significantly improving the accuracy of measurements of regulatory incidence. RDAU1.0 extends and adapts the RegData methodology to Australian regulations and legislation. We use RDAU1.0 to capture broad patterns in Australian regulation, and we compare these data to RegData findings from other regulatory jurisdictions, including the federal government in the United States and several US state governments. A preliminary analysis yields relational evidence consistent with previous researchers’ hypothesis that the extent of regulation will be determined by the size of the market because of the fixed costs of regulatory production. This hypothesis suggests that regulatory volume in a specific jurisdiction will scale as a function of the jurisdiction’s population. We examine RegData metrics of regulation for 23 different jurisdictions, including the federal governments of Australia and the United States and the state governments of 21 American states, and find a positive and significant correlation between regulatory volume and population.
在本文中,我们介绍了RegData Australia (RDAU1.0),并介绍了使用这个新面板的一些初步和比较结果。RDAU1.0应用RegData方法创建了一个从1997年到2012年的唯一的澳大利亚数据库。RegData使用文本分析来量化立法中的限制性条款,显著提高了监管发生率测量的准确性。RDAU1.0扩展并调整了RegData方法以适应澳大利亚的法规和立法。我们使用RDAU1.0来捕获澳大利亚监管中的广泛模式,并将这些数据与来自其他监管管辖区(包括美国联邦政府和几个美国州政府)的RegData发现进行比较。初步分析得出的相关证据与先前研究人员的假设一致,即监管的程度将由市场规模决定,因为监管生产的固定成本。这一假设表明,特定司法管辖区的监管量将作为该司法管辖区人口的函数而扩大。我们研究了23个不同司法管辖区(包括澳大利亚和美国联邦政府以及美国21个州的州政府)的RegData监管指标,发现监管量与人口之间存在显著的正相关关系。