The Invention of the “Eminent Monk”: Understanding the Biographical Craft of the Gaoseng zhuan through the Mingseng zhuan

Sangyop Lee
{"title":"The Invention of the “Eminent Monk”: Understanding the Biographical Craft of the Gaoseng zhuan through the Mingseng zhuan","authors":"Sangyop Lee","doi":"10.1163/15685322-10612p04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study investigates the compilation process of Huijiao’s (497-554)\n Gaoseng zhuan by utilizing the manuscript fragments of\n Baochang’s (ca. 466–?) Mingseng zhuan. I first\n question the long-standing assumption that the Mingseng zhuan\n was the “base text” of the Gaoseng zhuan, and\n propose to redefine the relationship between the two monastic biography\n collections more loosely by using the notion of “narrative\n community.” I then suggest that, despite the possible absence of a direct\n textual relation between the two collections, due to the Mingseng\n zhuan being more representative of the Buddhist narrative community\n of early medieval China, the comparison of the two collections is nonetheless\n germane to understanding the compilation process of the Gaoseng\n zhuan. Lastly, by comparing the lists of contents of the two\n collections I identify and analyze distinctive patterns in Huijiao’s\n selection and organization of monastic biographies that helped him perfect the\n idealized abstraction of the “eminent monk.”","PeriodicalId":378098,"journal":{"name":"T’oung Pao","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"T’oung Pao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685322-10612p04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study investigates the compilation process of Huijiao’s (497-554) Gaoseng zhuan by utilizing the manuscript fragments of Baochang’s (ca. 466–?) Mingseng zhuan. I first question the long-standing assumption that the Mingseng zhuan was the “base text” of the Gaoseng zhuan, and propose to redefine the relationship between the two monastic biography collections more loosely by using the notion of “narrative community.” I then suggest that, despite the possible absence of a direct textual relation between the two collections, due to the Mingseng zhuan being more representative of the Buddhist narrative community of early medieval China, the comparison of the two collections is nonetheless germane to understanding the compilation process of the Gaoseng zhuan. Lastly, by comparing the lists of contents of the two collections I identify and analyze distinctive patterns in Huijiao’s selection and organization of monastic biographies that helped him perfect the idealized abstraction of the “eminent monk.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“高僧”的创制:从《明僧传》看《高僧传》的传记性
本研究利用宝昌《高僧传》(约466 - 466)手稿片段,考察了会教(497-554)《高僧传》的编纂过程。Mingseng专。笔者首先质疑长期以来认为《明僧传》是《高僧传》的“基础文本”的假设,并提出用“叙事共同体”的概念来较为宽松地重新定义两部寺院传文集之间的关系。我认为,尽管这两部文集之间可能没有直接的文本关系,但由于《明僧传》更能代表中世纪早期中国的佛教叙事群体,对这两部文集的比较仍然与理解《高僧传》的编纂过程密切相关。最后,通过比较两本选集的内容,我发现并分析了徽教在选择和组织寺院传记方面的独特模式,这些模式帮助他完善了“高僧”的理想化抽象概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From the “Five Dynasties” 五代 to the “Ten States” 十國: Interpreting Post-Tang Identities in Northern Song (960–1127) Historiography Parting Ways: Daoism, Politics, and the Ming Book in Zhu Quan’s Letter to Yongle Pu Songling’s “Shibian” 尸變 and Vampiric Chases in the Chinese Tradition of Strange Narratives On General Terms for Texts in Early China Unauthorized Exchanges: Restrictions on Foreign Trade and Intermarriage in the Tang and Northern Song Empires
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1