Legal Analysis of the Scope of ‘Like Circumstances’ Concept under NAFTA National Treatment of Investments Obligation

N. Anozie
{"title":"Legal Analysis of the Scope of ‘Like Circumstances’ Concept under NAFTA National Treatment of Investments Obligation","authors":"N. Anozie","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2996863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper seeks to shed some light on the meaning and scope of the National Treatment Obligation ‘like circumstances’ concept under the NAFTA jurisprudence. It acknowledges without argument that the term ‘like circumstances’ admits to a variety of interpretations in literal terms, but argues by jurisprudential analysis that some factors ought to be taken into considerations in determining whether two investors or investments are in ‘like circumstance’ in the NAFTA context. One has to consider whether there is a competitive relationship between the foreign investor and its chosen domestic comparator; whether the two investments or investors are bound by the same legal regimes given the peculiarity of their business objectives, including but not limited to their product or service line; and the legitimacy of the measure in issue to determine when two investments are in like circumstances. This analysis should begin with the presence of a competitive relationship between the foreign investment and its domestic comparator. Only then would a further inquiry be made as to the legitimacy of the measure in issue. This is achieved by considering the connection between the measure in issue and an existing State regulation which is not being challenged by the foreign investor. To develop the thesis of this research, this paper is divided into three parts. Part I contains a brief introduction on the nature of national treatment, and then proceeds to highlight the centrality of ‘like circumstances’ in a breach of national treatment claim. Part II analyzes NAFTA case law on like circumstances, with a view to elaborating the various tests adopted by tribunals in deciding whether a foreign investor is in like circumstances with its identified domestic comparators. My analysis of the essential factors to be taken into consideration in the evaluation of ‘like circumstances’ is also contained in Part II. The final part includes the author’s conclusion and recommendations.","PeriodicalId":103245,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Trade Law (Topic)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Trade Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2996863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper seeks to shed some light on the meaning and scope of the National Treatment Obligation ‘like circumstances’ concept under the NAFTA jurisprudence. It acknowledges without argument that the term ‘like circumstances’ admits to a variety of interpretations in literal terms, but argues by jurisprudential analysis that some factors ought to be taken into considerations in determining whether two investors or investments are in ‘like circumstance’ in the NAFTA context. One has to consider whether there is a competitive relationship between the foreign investor and its chosen domestic comparator; whether the two investments or investors are bound by the same legal regimes given the peculiarity of their business objectives, including but not limited to their product or service line; and the legitimacy of the measure in issue to determine when two investments are in like circumstances. This analysis should begin with the presence of a competitive relationship between the foreign investment and its domestic comparator. Only then would a further inquiry be made as to the legitimacy of the measure in issue. This is achieved by considering the connection between the measure in issue and an existing State regulation which is not being challenged by the foreign investor. To develop the thesis of this research, this paper is divided into three parts. Part I contains a brief introduction on the nature of national treatment, and then proceeds to highlight the centrality of ‘like circumstances’ in a breach of national treatment claim. Part II analyzes NAFTA case law on like circumstances, with a view to elaborating the various tests adopted by tribunals in deciding whether a foreign investor is in like circumstances with its identified domestic comparators. My analysis of the essential factors to be taken into consideration in the evaluation of ‘like circumstances’ is also contained in Part II. The final part includes the author’s conclusion and recommendations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
北美自由贸易协定投资国民待遇义务下“类似情况”概念范围的法律分析
本文试图阐明NAFTA判例下国民待遇义务“类似情况”概念的含义和范围。它毫无争议地承认,“类似情况”一词在字面上可以有多种解释,但通过法学分析认为,在确定两个投资者或投资是否在北美自由贸易协定的背景下处于“类似情况”时,应该考虑一些因素。必须考虑外国投资者与其选定的国内比较国之间是否存在竞争关系;鉴于其业务目标的特殊性,包括但不限于其产品或服务系列,两家投资机构或投资者是否受相同法律制度的约束;以及确定两项投资何时处于类似情况的措施的合法性。这种分析应该从外国投资与其国内比较物之间是否存在竞争关系开始。只有这样,才能进一步调查所讨论的措施的合法性。要做到这一点,就要考虑到所讨论的措施与没有受到外国投资者挑战的现行国家条例之间的联系。为了展开本文的研究,本文分为三个部分。第一部分简要介绍了国民待遇的性质,然后着重强调了“类似情况”在违反国民待遇索赔中的中心地位。第二部分分析了北美自由贸易协定关于类似情况的判例法,目的是详细说明法庭在决定外国投资者是否与其确定的国内比较者处于类似情况时采用的各种检验标准。我对“类似情况”评估中需要考虑的基本因素的分析也包含在第二部分中。最后一部分是作者的结论和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pragmatic Literary Theories and WTO Treaty Interpretation Clearing the fog: Forest Stewardship Council labelling and the World Trade Organization ОСОБЛИВОСТІ ЗАСТОСУВАННЯ ТОРГОВИХ ЗВИЧАЇВ У МІЖНАРОДНИХ КОМЕРЦІЙНИХ АРБІТРАЖНИХ СПОРАХ (Peculiarities of Trade Usages Application in International Commercial Arbitration Disputes) Is it Time for India to Adopt the Convention on the Sale of Goods? Impact of Financial Liberalization on Current Account with Complementary Effect of Institution: A Global Evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1