{"title":"Comparison of Different LMP Calculations in Power Market Simulation","authors":"F. Li, R. Bo, Wenjuan Zhang","doi":"10.1109/ICPST.2006.321838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ongoing de-regulation of the U.S. electric power industry is to build open-access, non-discriminative and competitive electricity markets. In 2002 the federal energy regulatory commission (FERC) proposed Standard Market Design (SMD), in which the key is the locational marginal pricing (LMP) methodology to determine the energy price and to manage the network congestion. LMP has been adopted by or is under implementation at a number of ISO's such as PJM, NYISO, ISO-New England, etc. This paper presents an iterative DC optimal power flow (DCOPF) algorithm to calculate LMP. Iteration is needed in a linearized DC network because the loss factor is dependent on generation dispatch, while generation dispatch is affected by loss factor as well. The results from DCOPF are compared with ACOPF algorithm at different loading levels and transmission line resistances. It is interesting to observe that the LMP results from two models are close for most of the loading levels, but may be significantly different in a few scenarios when the error in the linearized DC model causes the change of marginal units. It is also interesting to observe the increasing trend of the difference between two models when line resistance grows.","PeriodicalId":181574,"journal":{"name":"2006 International Conference on Power System Technology","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 International Conference on Power System Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPST.2006.321838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
The ongoing de-regulation of the U.S. electric power industry is to build open-access, non-discriminative and competitive electricity markets. In 2002 the federal energy regulatory commission (FERC) proposed Standard Market Design (SMD), in which the key is the locational marginal pricing (LMP) methodology to determine the energy price and to manage the network congestion. LMP has been adopted by or is under implementation at a number of ISO's such as PJM, NYISO, ISO-New England, etc. This paper presents an iterative DC optimal power flow (DCOPF) algorithm to calculate LMP. Iteration is needed in a linearized DC network because the loss factor is dependent on generation dispatch, while generation dispatch is affected by loss factor as well. The results from DCOPF are compared with ACOPF algorithm at different loading levels and transmission line resistances. It is interesting to observe that the LMP results from two models are close for most of the loading levels, but may be significantly different in a few scenarios when the error in the linearized DC model causes the change of marginal units. It is also interesting to observe the increasing trend of the difference between two models when line resistance grows.
正在进行的对美国电力行业的放松管制是为了建立开放准入、非歧视和竞争的电力市场。2002年,联邦能源监管委员会(FERC)提出了标准市场设计(SMD),其中关键是确定能源价格和管理网络拥堵的位置边际定价(LMP)方法。LMP已被许多ISO采用或正在实施,如PJM、NYISO、ISO- new England等。本文提出了一种计算LMP的迭代直流最优潮流(DCOPF)算法。由于损耗因子依赖于发电调度,而发电调度又受损耗因子的影响,线性化直流网络需要进行迭代。将DCOPF算法与ACOPF算法在不同负载水平和传输线电阻下的结果进行了比较。有趣的是,两种模型的LMP结果在大多数负载水平下是接近的,但在线性化直流模型的误差导致边际单位变化的少数情况下可能会有显著差异。有趣的是,当线路阻力增大时,两个模型之间的差值也呈增大趋势。