Schopenhauer’s Pessimism in Light of His Evolving System

Sandra Shapshay
{"title":"Schopenhauer’s Pessimism in Light of His Evolving System","authors":"Sandra Shapshay","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190906801.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter argues that the pessimistic doctrine that Schopenhauer does espouse is that (a) there is a preponderance of undeserved suffering in the world; (b) this is an extremely bad-making feature of existence that is not outweighed by any good-making features; and (c) this situation cannot get substantially better in time. The metaphysical and empirical reasons he adduces to support this pessimistic doctrine are then investigated. Ultimately, the chapter argues that the grounds for his pessimism are weak and become weaker as his philosophy develops in light of proto-Darwinian thought from 1818 to 1859. Two facets of this development are especially salient: First, Schopenhauer comes to rely less on the Platonic Ideas to explain the fixity of species and instead embraces proto-Darwinian evolutionary theory. This change has important ramifications for Schopenhauer’s system that he never works out. One of these is that from within Schopenhauer’s mature system, there emerge some grounds for hope that the human (and even non-human animal) condition can get significantly better. Second, Schopenhauer emphasizes more in his later work (WWR II) the hermeneutic nature of his metaphysics. Given the sort of metaphysical methodology he embraces, the identification of thing-in-itself with will cannot be used in a foundationalist manner, by the lights of his own theorizing, to support pessimism by demonstrating that the world cannot get substantially better. His hermeneutic metaphysics must always be responsive to the empirical evidence, and there may be actual evidence of progress.","PeriodicalId":130585,"journal":{"name":"Reconstructing Schopenhauer's Ethics","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reconstructing Schopenhauer's Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190906801.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter argues that the pessimistic doctrine that Schopenhauer does espouse is that (a) there is a preponderance of undeserved suffering in the world; (b) this is an extremely bad-making feature of existence that is not outweighed by any good-making features; and (c) this situation cannot get substantially better in time. The metaphysical and empirical reasons he adduces to support this pessimistic doctrine are then investigated. Ultimately, the chapter argues that the grounds for his pessimism are weak and become weaker as his philosophy develops in light of proto-Darwinian thought from 1818 to 1859. Two facets of this development are especially salient: First, Schopenhauer comes to rely less on the Platonic Ideas to explain the fixity of species and instead embraces proto-Darwinian evolutionary theory. This change has important ramifications for Schopenhauer’s system that he never works out. One of these is that from within Schopenhauer’s mature system, there emerge some grounds for hope that the human (and even non-human animal) condition can get significantly better. Second, Schopenhauer emphasizes more in his later work (WWR II) the hermeneutic nature of his metaphysics. Given the sort of metaphysical methodology he embraces, the identification of thing-in-itself with will cannot be used in a foundationalist manner, by the lights of his own theorizing, to support pessimism by demonstrating that the world cannot get substantially better. His hermeneutic metaphysics must always be responsive to the empirical evidence, and there may be actual evidence of progress.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
叔本华的悲观主义——从他的演化体系看
本章认为,叔本华所信奉的悲观主义学说是:(a)世界上存在着大量不应得的痛苦;(b)这是一种极其恶劣的存在特征,没有任何良好的存在特征所抵消;(c)这种情况不可能及时得到实质性的改善。他引用的形而上学和经验的原因,以支持这一悲观的学说,然后进行了调查。最后,本章认为,他的悲观主义的基础是薄弱的,并且随着他的哲学在1818年至1859年的原始达尔文思想的发展而变得越来越弱。这一发展的两个方面尤为突出:首先,叔本华开始较少依赖柏拉图式的思想来解释物种的固定性,而是接受了原始达尔文的进化论。这一变化对叔本华的体系有着重要的影响,而叔本华从来没有解决过这个问题。其中之一是,在叔本华的成熟体系中,我们有理由希望人类(甚至是非人类的动物)的状况能够显著改善。其次,叔本华在他后来的著作(二战)中更多地强调了他的形而上学的解释学本质。考虑到他所信奉的那种形而上学方法论,根据他自己的理论,将自在之物与意志的认同不能以一种基础主义的方式来支持悲观主义,即证明世界不会变得本质上更好。他的解释学形而上学必须总是对经验证据作出反应,而且可能有实际的进步证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Role for Reason in Schopenhauer’s Ethics A Tale of Two Schopenhauers Schopenhauer’s Pessimism in Light of His Evolving System Freedom and Morality Compassionate Moral Realism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1