Recent Directions in Critical Theory

D. Foster
{"title":"Recent Directions in Critical Theory","authors":"D. Foster","doi":"10.2307/1347458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If Critical Theory Since 1965 had been published by Norton, it would probably have been called The Norton Anthology of Contemporary Critical Theory, for there is no question that writing about the study of literature has become virtually a recognizable genre of text production. Having freed itself from the idea that criticism enjoys a parasitic relationship to primary literary texts, such writing enjoys the prerogatives vying for equal importance with conventionally identified literary genres, of viewing itself as making the recognition of literature possible by defining the parameters of the literary phenomenon, and of sustaining a tension between literary text production and other forms of cultural production that legitimates the ideological role of both literature and criticism in societies.","PeriodicalId":326714,"journal":{"name":"Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1347458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

If Critical Theory Since 1965 had been published by Norton, it would probably have been called The Norton Anthology of Contemporary Critical Theory, for there is no question that writing about the study of literature has become virtually a recognizable genre of text production. Having freed itself from the idea that criticism enjoys a parasitic relationship to primary literary texts, such writing enjoys the prerogatives vying for equal importance with conventionally identified literary genres, of viewing itself as making the recognition of literature possible by defining the parameters of the literary phenomenon, and of sustaining a tension between literary text production and other forms of cultural production that legitimates the ideological role of both literature and criticism in societies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
批判理论的最新方向
如果《1965年以来的批判理论》由诺顿出版,它可能会被称为《诺顿当代批判理论选集》,因为毫无疑问,关于文学研究的写作实际上已经成为一种可识别的文本生产类型。把自己从批评与主要文学文本的寄生关系中解放出来,这样的写作享有与传统文学流派同等重要的特权,通过定义文学现象的参数,将自己视为对文学的认可成为可能,在文学文本生产和其他形式的文化生产之间保持一种紧张关系,这种紧张关系使文学和批评在社会中的意识形态角色合法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Writing Gender in Early Modern Chinese Women's Tanci Fiction by Li Guo H. D. between Image and Epic: The Mysteries of Her Poetics by Gary Burnett (review) Mapping the Landscape in Addison's "Pleasures of the Imagination" Dancer Very Close and Very Slow by Judith Hemschemeyer (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1