Bicriterion Coevolution for the Multi-objective Travelling Salesperson Problem

Ying Liu, P. Thulasiraman, N. Pillay
{"title":"Bicriterion Coevolution for the Multi-objective Travelling Salesperson Problem","authors":"Ying Liu, P. Thulasiraman, N. Pillay","doi":"10.1109/CEC55065.2022.9870282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The travelling salesperson problem is an NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem. In this paper, we consider the multi-objective travelling salesperson problem (MTSP), both static and dynamic, with conflicting objectives. NSGA-II and MOEA/D, two popular evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms suffer from loss of diversity and poor convergence when applied separately on MTSP. However, both these techniques have their individual strengths. NSGA-II maintains di-versity through non-dominated sorting and crowding distance selection. MOEA/D is good at exploring extreme points on the Pareto front with faster convergence. In this paper, we adopt the bicriterion framework that exploits the strengths of Pareto-Criterion (PC) and Non-Pareto Criterion (NPC) evolutionary populations. In this research, NSGA-II (PC) and MOEA/D (NPC) coevolve to compensate the diversity of each other. We further improve the convergence using local search and a hybrid of order crossover and inver-over operators. To our knowledge, this is the first work that combines NSGA-II and MOEA/D in a bicriterion framework for solving MTSP, both static and dynamic. We perform various experiments on different MTSP bench-mark datasets with and without traffic factors to study static and dynamic MTSP. Our proposed algorithm is compared against standard algorithms such as NSGA-II & III, MOEA/D, and a baseline divide and conquer coevolution technique using performance metrics such as inverted generational distance, hypervolume, and the spacing metric to concurrently quantify the convergence and diversity of our proposed algorithm. We also compare our results to datasets used in the literature and show that our proposed algorithm performs empirically better than compared algorithms.","PeriodicalId":153241,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC55065.2022.9870282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The travelling salesperson problem is an NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem. In this paper, we consider the multi-objective travelling salesperson problem (MTSP), both static and dynamic, with conflicting objectives. NSGA-II and MOEA/D, two popular evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms suffer from loss of diversity and poor convergence when applied separately on MTSP. However, both these techniques have their individual strengths. NSGA-II maintains di-versity through non-dominated sorting and crowding distance selection. MOEA/D is good at exploring extreme points on the Pareto front with faster convergence. In this paper, we adopt the bicriterion framework that exploits the strengths of Pareto-Criterion (PC) and Non-Pareto Criterion (NPC) evolutionary populations. In this research, NSGA-II (PC) and MOEA/D (NPC) coevolve to compensate the diversity of each other. We further improve the convergence using local search and a hybrid of order crossover and inver-over operators. To our knowledge, this is the first work that combines NSGA-II and MOEA/D in a bicriterion framework for solving MTSP, both static and dynamic. We perform various experiments on different MTSP bench-mark datasets with and without traffic factors to study static and dynamic MTSP. Our proposed algorithm is compared against standard algorithms such as NSGA-II & III, MOEA/D, and a baseline divide and conquer coevolution technique using performance metrics such as inverted generational distance, hypervolume, and the spacing metric to concurrently quantify the convergence and diversity of our proposed algorithm. We also compare our results to datasets used in the literature and show that our proposed algorithm performs empirically better than compared algorithms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多目标旅行推销员问题的双准则协同进化
旅行推销员问题是一个NP-hard组合优化问题。本文研究了具有冲突目标的静态和动态多目标旅行销售问题。NSGA-II和MOEA/D这两种常用的进化多目标优化算法分别应用于MTSP时存在多样性丧失和收敛性差的问题。然而,这两种技术都有各自的优势。NSGA-II通过非显性排序和拥挤距离选择维持多样性。MOEA/D擅长探索Pareto前沿的极值点,收敛速度更快。在本文中,我们采用了利用帕累托标准(PC)和非帕累托标准(NPC)进化群体优势的双标准框架。在本研究中,NSGA-II (PC)和MOEA/D (NPC)共同进化以补偿彼此的多样性。我们使用局部搜索和混合阶交叉和反转算子进一步提高了收敛性。据我们所知,这是第一个将NSGA-II和MOEA/D结合在静态和动态双标准框架中解决MTSP的工作。我们在不同的MTSP基准数据集上进行了各种实验,研究了静态和动态MTSP。将我们提出的算法与标准算法(如NSGA-II和III, MOEA/D)和基线分而治之的协同进化技术进行比较,使用诸如倒代距离,hypervolume和间隔度量等性能指标来同时量化我们提出的算法的收敛性和多样性。我们还将我们的结果与文献中使用的数据集进行了比较,并表明我们提出的算法在经验上比比较的算法表现得更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impacts of Single-objective Landscapes on Multi-objective Optimization Cooperative Multi-objective Topology Optimization Using Clustering and Metamodeling Global and Local Area Coverage Path Planner for a Reconfigurable Robot A New Integer Linear Program and A Grouping Genetic Algorithm with Controlled Gene Transmission for Joint Order Batching and Picking Routing Problem Test Case Prioritization and Reduction Using Hybrid Quantum-behaved Particle Swarm Optimization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1