IMPROVEMENT OF THE COMPETENCE LEARNING TO LEARN THROUGH PEER-ASSESSMENT PROCESSES WITH MOODLE'S WORKSHOP

Nicoleta Duță, L. Pons, Elena Cano
{"title":"IMPROVEMENT OF THE COMPETENCE LEARNING TO LEARN THROUGH PEER-ASSESSMENT PROCESSES WITH MOODLE'S WORKSHOP","authors":"Nicoleta Duță, L. Pons, Elena Cano","doi":"10.12753/2066-026x-18-013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The design of the Research project \"Analysis of the influence of the assessor and assessee roles in the feed-up, feed-back and feed-forward processes and their impact on academic performance\" (reference REDICE16-1460) and the innovation project \"P2P4L2L (Peer to Peer for Learning to Learn)\" (reference 2016PID-UB / 024) are presented. This project aims to incorporate peer review practices (peer to peer) to promote the development of the cross-curricular competence learning to learn. The innovation consists precisely in students assessing the work of their classmates through Moodle's 'Workshop'. It is evaluated the increase of the competence learning to learn these practices generate through an adaptation of the instrument proposed by Munoz et al. (2016), which is administered at the beginning and at the end of the innovation experience to determine if this practice has had a positive impact on students' learning to learn competence. Peer review is a reciprocal process whereby students produce feedback reviews on the work of peers and receive feedback reviews from peers on their own work (Nicol, Thomson and Breslin, 2014). An important process within this is shared assessment, which refers to student involvement in the assessment and learning practice, a process of dialogue and collaboration between teacher and students aimed at improving the learning process, both individually and collectively. In addition, at the end, the impact of the innovative experience on the perception of student learning is assessed through an adaptation of the questionnaire of Gallego et al. (2013). The results presented here seem to indicate that the Moodle's 'Workshop' has advantages, it makes it possible to obtain information about the activity of the students, which allows the teacher to influence more in their learning","PeriodicalId":371908,"journal":{"name":"14th International Conference eLearning and Software for Education","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"14th International Conference eLearning and Software for Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12753/2066-026x-18-013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The design of the Research project "Analysis of the influence of the assessor and assessee roles in the feed-up, feed-back and feed-forward processes and their impact on academic performance" (reference REDICE16-1460) and the innovation project "P2P4L2L (Peer to Peer for Learning to Learn)" (reference 2016PID-UB / 024) are presented. This project aims to incorporate peer review practices (peer to peer) to promote the development of the cross-curricular competence learning to learn. The innovation consists precisely in students assessing the work of their classmates through Moodle's 'Workshop'. It is evaluated the increase of the competence learning to learn these practices generate through an adaptation of the instrument proposed by Munoz et al. (2016), which is administered at the beginning and at the end of the innovation experience to determine if this practice has had a positive impact on students' learning to learn competence. Peer review is a reciprocal process whereby students produce feedback reviews on the work of peers and receive feedback reviews from peers on their own work (Nicol, Thomson and Breslin, 2014). An important process within this is shared assessment, which refers to student involvement in the assessment and learning practice, a process of dialogue and collaboration between teacher and students aimed at improving the learning process, both individually and collectively. In addition, at the end, the impact of the innovative experience on the perception of student learning is assessed through an adaptation of the questionnaire of Gallego et al. (2013). The results presented here seem to indicate that the Moodle's 'Workshop' has advantages, it makes it possible to obtain information about the activity of the students, which allows the teacher to influence more in their learning
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过moodle工作坊的同行评估过程提高学习能力
研究项目“评估者和被评估者角色在反馈、反馈和前馈过程中的影响分析及其对学业成绩的影响”(参考文献REDICE16-1460)和创新项目“P2P4L2L (Peer to Peer for Learning to Learn)”的设计(参考文献2016PID-UB / 024)本计划旨在结合同侪评议实践(peer to peer),促进跨课程学习能力的发展。Moodle的创新之处在于,学生可以通过Moodle的“工作坊”来评估同学的作业。通过对Munoz等人(2016)提出的工具进行调整来评估学习这些实践的能力学习的增加,该工具在创新体验的开始和结束时进行管理,以确定该实践是否对学生学习能力的学习产生了积极影响。同行评议是一个互惠的过程,学生对同行的工作进行反馈评论,并从同行那里获得对自己工作的反馈评论(Nicol, Thomson和Breslin, 2014)。其中一个重要的过程是共享评估,它指的是学生参与评估和学习实践,这是教师和学生之间的对话和合作的过程,旨在改善个人和集体的学习过程。此外,最后,通过改编Gallego等人(2013)的问卷,评估了创新体验对学生学习感知的影响。这里展示的结果似乎表明Moodle的“研讨会”具有优势,它可以获得有关学生活动的信息,这使得教师能够在他们的学习中发挥更大的作用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND MACHINE LEARNING - FUTURE TRENDS IN TEACHING ESL AND ESP DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF A SERIOUS GAME FOR TREATING ACROPHOBIA ONLINE LEARNING OF TEXTILE ENGINEERING USING MOODLE PLATFORM FREE ONLINE EDUCATION - THE FUTURE OF A BETTER WORLD? ONLINE MARKETING STRATEGIES USED TO DEVELOP ONLINE COURSES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1