Cleaning Strategies and Cost Modelling of Experimental Membrane-based Desalination Plants

D. Karimanzira, J. Went, F. Neumann
{"title":"Cleaning Strategies and Cost Modelling of Experimental Membrane-based Desalination Plants","authors":"D. Karimanzira, J. Went, F. Neumann","doi":"10.12691/IJEFM-9-1-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Project WASTEC, an experimental Reverse Osmosis (RO) desalination system was developed. It serves as a platform for testing new technologies. For this system, we solved two problems, which are described in this paper. Firstly, we developed and investigated strategies for scheduling chemical enhanced backwashing and chemical cleaning and secondly, due to the experimental nature of the project, several new technological developments with respect to materials and methods were integrated into the system and requires tools for evaluating the economic viability of the new technologies. In this task, the economics of membrane-based desalination will be investigated. Baseline systems of reverse osmosis and pretreatment systems (microfiltration and ultrafiltration) will be economically examined and compared for their investments and operational costs. Sensitivity of the different plant and membrane parameters to the cost will be studied. Results show that with respect to costs, for a 200m3/hr design capacity plant, a volume of water is produced by a MF process at a cost of $0.494 and at a cost of $0.486 by an ultrafiltration process microfiltration. The reverse osmosis process cannot be compared directly, but it required $ 0.49 / m3 for a plant with 56 m3/hour design capacity. The values are in line with the costs reported in literature for membrane-based filtration.","PeriodicalId":429534,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Econometrics and Financial Management","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Econometrics and Financial Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/IJEFM-9-1-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Project WASTEC, an experimental Reverse Osmosis (RO) desalination system was developed. It serves as a platform for testing new technologies. For this system, we solved two problems, which are described in this paper. Firstly, we developed and investigated strategies for scheduling chemical enhanced backwashing and chemical cleaning and secondly, due to the experimental nature of the project, several new technological developments with respect to materials and methods were integrated into the system and requires tools for evaluating the economic viability of the new technologies. In this task, the economics of membrane-based desalination will be investigated. Baseline systems of reverse osmosis and pretreatment systems (microfiltration and ultrafiltration) will be economically examined and compared for their investments and operational costs. Sensitivity of the different plant and membrane parameters to the cost will be studied. Results show that with respect to costs, for a 200m3/hr design capacity plant, a volume of water is produced by a MF process at a cost of $0.494 and at a cost of $0.486 by an ultrafiltration process microfiltration. The reverse osmosis process cannot be compared directly, but it required $ 0.49 / m3 for a plant with 56 m3/hour design capacity. The values are in line with the costs reported in literature for membrane-based filtration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实验膜基海水淡化厂的清洁策略和成本模型
在WASTEC项目中,开发了一个实验性的反渗透(RO)海水淡化系统。它是测试新技术的平台。针对该系统,我们解决了两个问题,本文对此进行了描述。首先,我们开发和研究了化学强化反洗和化学清洗的调度策略,其次,由于项目的实验性质,在材料和方法方面的一些新技术发展被整合到系统中,需要评估新技术经济可行性的工具。在这项任务中,膜基脱盐的经济性将进行研究。将对反渗透和预处理系统(微滤和超滤)的基线系统进行经济审查,并对其投资和运行成本进行比较。研究了不同的装置和膜参数对成本的敏感性。结果表明,在成本方面,对于一个设计容量为200m3/hr的工厂,采用MF工艺生产一体积水的成本为0.494美元,采用超滤工艺微滤的成本为0.486美元。反渗透工艺不能直接比较,但对于设计能力为56立方米/小时的工厂,其成本为0.49美元/立方米。这些值与文献中报道的膜基过滤成本一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding Growth Strategies and Performance: Empirical Investigation of Cement Manufacturing Firms in Kenya Forecasting Stock Market Out-of-Sample with Regularised Regression Training Techniques Study on Level Evaluation and Development Path of the Open Economy in Ningxia Economic Analysis of Takeovers and Mergers and the Evaluation of Takeover Bids Cleaning Strategies and Cost Modelling of Experimental Membrane-based Desalination Plants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1