Healthcare Policy: Federally Mandated Insurance Coverage for Infertility Treatment

Tanesha Tutt
{"title":"Healthcare Policy: Federally Mandated Insurance Coverage for Infertility Treatment","authors":"Tanesha Tutt","doi":"10.52214/CSWR.V19I1.7587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Approximately 15% of couples in the United States (U.S.) suffer from infertility. Existing infertility treatments and alternate paths to parenthood, such as adoption, are available but financially inaccessible and require self-payment. Although organizations such as the American Medical Association (AMA) and World Health Organization (WHO) classify infertility as a disease, the U.S. has not federally mandated insurance coverage for infertility. Currently, only 15 states require insurance companies to offer some type of fertility benefit and these requirements vary across states. \nThis paper discusses the need to federally mandate insurance coverage for infertility in the U.S. Infertility not only causes devastating outcomes for individual families, but affects nearly all demographics across the world. However, national legislation on infertility coverage continues to fail the many couples who suffer from this condition. The paper concludes with implications for social work practice and recommends ways social workers can support this policy movement. Social workers have an ethical duty  not only to address clients’ mental and emotional needs, but also to be at the frontlines of policy and to advocate for federal insurance coverage for clients who desperately want to realize their dream of conceiving a child.","PeriodicalId":130000,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Social Work Review","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia Social Work Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52214/CSWR.V19I1.7587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Approximately 15% of couples in the United States (U.S.) suffer from infertility. Existing infertility treatments and alternate paths to parenthood, such as adoption, are available but financially inaccessible and require self-payment. Although organizations such as the American Medical Association (AMA) and World Health Organization (WHO) classify infertility as a disease, the U.S. has not federally mandated insurance coverage for infertility. Currently, only 15 states require insurance companies to offer some type of fertility benefit and these requirements vary across states.  This paper discusses the need to federally mandate insurance coverage for infertility in the U.S. Infertility not only causes devastating outcomes for individual families, but affects nearly all demographics across the world. However, national legislation on infertility coverage continues to fail the many couples who suffer from this condition. The paper concludes with implications for social work practice and recommends ways social workers can support this policy movement. Social workers have an ethical duty  not only to address clients’ mental and emotional needs, but also to be at the frontlines of policy and to advocate for federal insurance coverage for clients who desperately want to realize their dream of conceiving a child.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健政策:联邦政府规定的不孕不育治疗保险
在美国,大约15%的夫妇患有不孕症。现有的不孕症治疗和收养等替代生育途径是可行的,但在经济上无法获得,需要自费。虽然像美国医学协会(AMA)和世界卫生组织(WHO)这样的组织将不孕症列为一种疾病,但美国并没有联邦政府强制规定为不孕症提供保险。目前,只有15个州要求保险公司提供某种类型的生育福利,这些要求因州而异。本文讨论了在美国联邦政府强制要求不孕不育保险的必要性。不孕不育不仅对个别家庭造成毁灭性的后果,而且影响到全世界几乎所有的人口统计数据。然而,关于不孕症的国家立法仍然未能覆盖许多患有这种疾病的夫妇。论文总结了对社会工作实践的启示,并建议社会工作者支持这一政策运动的方法。社会工作者有道德责任,不仅要解决客户的精神和情感需求,而且要站在政策的最前线,为那些迫切想要实现怀孕梦想的客户倡导联邦保险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"Small Victories of Survival in a Deeply Homophobic World": Current Realities and Paths Forward for Substance Use in the LGBTQIA+ Community Where Were the Social Workers? A Historical Overview of the Social Work Profession’s Complicity in the Family Policing System Disability and Self: Critical Factors in Positive Adjustment After the Onset of Disability in Emerging Adulthood Choosing a Frame: How Medusa Tells the Story of Trauma and Life After Trauma New York's Directive for Mental Health Involuntary Removals: The Intersectional Risk for Unhoused New Yorkers with a Serious Mental Illness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1