Provocation and Control Over the Commission of a Crime: Significance and Correlation

L. Arkusha, O. Torbas
{"title":"Provocation and Control Over the Commission of a Crime: Significance and Correlation","authors":"L. Arkusha, O. Torbas","doi":"10.2991/AEBMR.K.210320.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Provocation (in a broad sense) must be identified as a set of measures based on the application of the method of psychological (manipulative) influence on the life of an individual (or groups) in order to achieve appropriate goal. A provocation over the commission a crime is an action (or inaction) of law enforcement agencies against an individual (or group of persons) in order to influence their decision to commit a crime, provided that the previously mentioned person (persons) did not intend to do so. In contrast to the provocation, control over its commission could be applied in the presence of following conditions: 1) the crime in any case would be committed regardless of the intervention of law enforcement agencies or undercover officers (agents); 2) law enforcement agencies became aware of the likelihood of committing a crime after the intent of the person who plans to commit it; 3) passive role of law enforcement officers or undercover officers (agents) in committing a crime; 4) strict documentary recording of all actions conducted by law enforcement agencies. In order to increase the level of efficiency of covert employees (agents) activities to separate control over the commission of a crime from provocation, it is necessary to set strict rules for their possible actions and the conditions of their use in combating specific manifestations of crime. It was established that activities of all law enforcement agencies of Ukraine require unification of instructions for undercover officers (agents), in compliance with the Law of Ukraine \"On State Secrets\".","PeriodicalId":132554,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Economics, Law and Education Research (ELER 2021)","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Economics, Law and Education Research (ELER 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/AEBMR.K.210320.025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Provocation (in a broad sense) must be identified as a set of measures based on the application of the method of psychological (manipulative) influence on the life of an individual (or groups) in order to achieve appropriate goal. A provocation over the commission a crime is an action (or inaction) of law enforcement agencies against an individual (or group of persons) in order to influence their decision to commit a crime, provided that the previously mentioned person (persons) did not intend to do so. In contrast to the provocation, control over its commission could be applied in the presence of following conditions: 1) the crime in any case would be committed regardless of the intervention of law enforcement agencies or undercover officers (agents); 2) law enforcement agencies became aware of the likelihood of committing a crime after the intent of the person who plans to commit it; 3) passive role of law enforcement officers or undercover officers (agents) in committing a crime; 4) strict documentary recording of all actions conducted by law enforcement agencies. In order to increase the level of efficiency of covert employees (agents) activities to separate control over the commission of a crime from provocation, it is necessary to set strict rules for their possible actions and the conditions of their use in combating specific manifestations of crime. It was established that activities of all law enforcement agencies of Ukraine require unification of instructions for undercover officers (agents), in compliance with the Law of Ukraine "On State Secrets".
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
犯罪的诱导与控制:意义与关联
挑衅(广义上)必须被确定为一套以对个人(或群体)的生活施加心理(操纵)影响的方法为基础的措施,以实现适当的目标。对犯罪的挑衅是执法机构对个人(或群体)采取的行动(或不作为),以影响其犯罪的决定,前提是上述人员无意这样做。与挑衅行为相反,在下列情况下可以对其实施控制:1)无论执法机构或卧底人员(特工)是否干预,在任何情况下都将实施犯罪;2)执法机构在计划实施犯罪的人的意图之后才意识到实施犯罪的可能性;3)执法人员或卧底人员(特工)在犯罪过程中扮演被动角色;4)对执法机构的所有行动进行严格的书面记录。为了提高秘密雇员(特工)活动的效率水平,将对犯罪的控制与挑衅分开,有必要对他们可能采取的行动及其在打击具体犯罪表现时的使用条件制定严格的规则。经确定,乌克兰所有执法机构的活动都需要按照乌克兰“国家机密”法,统一对便衣官员(特工)的指示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of Socio-Professional Activity of Personality in Conditions of Distance Education During Covid-19 Pandemic Technologies of Distance Learning for Teaching Primary School Subjects of During the COVID-19 Pandemic Formation of Students’ Methodological Culture in Vocal Training at University Justice in Pedagogical Interactions as a Factor of Mental Health of Participants in Educational Process of Participants in Educational Process The Current State of the Investment Environment in Ukraine and its Impact on the Investment Security of the State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1