Machine Learning-Enabled High-Frequency Low-Power Digital Design Implementation At Advanced Process Nodes

S. Nath, Vishal Khandelwal
{"title":"Machine Learning-Enabled High-Frequency Low-Power Digital Design Implementation At Advanced Process Nodes","authors":"S. Nath, Vishal Khandelwal","doi":"10.1145/3439706.3447043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relentless pursuit of high-frequency low-power designs at advanced nodes necessitate achieving signoff-quality timing and power during digital implementation to minimize any over-design. With growing design sizes (1--10M instances), full flow runtime is an equally important metric and commercial implementation tools use graph-based timing analysis (GBA) to gain runtime over path-based timing analysis (PBA), at the cost of pessimism in timing. Last mile timing and power closure is then achieved through expensive PBA-driven engineering change order (ECO) loops in signoff stage. In this work, we explore \"on-the-fly'' machine learning (ML) models to predict PBA timing based on GBA features, to drive digital implementation flow. Our ML model reduces the GBA vs. PBA pessimism with minimal runtime overhead, resulting in improved area/power without compromising on signoff timing closure. Experimental results obtained by integrating our technique in a commercial digital implementation tool show improvement of up to 0.92% in area, 11.7% and 1.16% in power in leakage- and total power-centric designs, respectively. Our method has a runtime overhead of $\\sim$3% across a suite of 5--16nm industrial designs.","PeriodicalId":184050,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2021 International Symposium on Physical Design","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2021 International Symposium on Physical Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3439706.3447043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Relentless pursuit of high-frequency low-power designs at advanced nodes necessitate achieving signoff-quality timing and power during digital implementation to minimize any over-design. With growing design sizes (1--10M instances), full flow runtime is an equally important metric and commercial implementation tools use graph-based timing analysis (GBA) to gain runtime over path-based timing analysis (PBA), at the cost of pessimism in timing. Last mile timing and power closure is then achieved through expensive PBA-driven engineering change order (ECO) loops in signoff stage. In this work, we explore "on-the-fly'' machine learning (ML) models to predict PBA timing based on GBA features, to drive digital implementation flow. Our ML model reduces the GBA vs. PBA pessimism with minimal runtime overhead, resulting in improved area/power without compromising on signoff timing closure. Experimental results obtained by integrating our technique in a commercial digital implementation tool show improvement of up to 0.92% in area, 11.7% and 1.16% in power in leakage- and total power-centric designs, respectively. Our method has a runtime overhead of $\sim$3% across a suite of 5--16nm industrial designs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在高级工艺节点上实现机器学习的高频低功耗数字设计
在高级节点上不断追求高频低功耗设计,需要在数字实现期间实现信号质量定时和功率,以尽量减少任何过度设计。随着设计规模的增长(1- 10M实例),全流程运行时是一个同样重要的指标,商业实现工具使用基于图的时间分析(GBA)来获得运行时,而不是基于路径的时间分析(PBA),这是以时间的悲观为代价的。最后一英里计时和功率关闭,然后通过昂贵的pba驱动的工程变更命令(ECO)回路在签字阶段实现。在这项工作中,我们探索了“即时”机器学习(ML)模型来预测基于GBA特征的PBA时间,以推动数字化实施流程。我们的ML模型以最小的运行时开销减少了GBA和PBA的悲观情绪,从而在不影响签字时间关闭的情况下提高了面积/功率。通过将我们的技术集成到商业数字实现工具中获得的实验结果表明,在泄漏和总功率为中心的设计中,面积提高了0.92%,功率提高了11.7%和1.16%。我们的方法在5- 16nm工业设计套件中的运行时开销为$ $ $3%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reinforcement Learning for Placement Optimization Session details: Session 8: Monolithic 3D and Packaging Session ISPD 2021 Wafer-Scale Physics Modeling Contest: A New Frontier for Partitioning, Placement and Routing Scalable System and Silicon Architectures to Handle the Workloads of the Post-Moore Era A Lifetime of ICs, and Cross-field Exploration: ISPD 2021 Lifetime Achievement Award Bio
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1