The Commission's European Agenda for the Collaborative Economy – (Too) Platform and Service Provider Friendly?

C. Cauffman
{"title":"The Commission's European Agenda for the Collaborative Economy – (Too) Platform and Service Provider Friendly?","authors":"C. Cauffman","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2883845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 2 June 2016, the Commission published a Communication containing “A European agenda for the collaborative economy”. The Communication intends to provide non-binding legal guidance and policy orientation on the sustainable development of the collaborative economy. It contains a number of helpful suggestions for example as to when an individual offering services via an online platform is to be regarded as an employee. The advice to ensure a high level of consumer protection while not imposing disproportionate burdens on non-professional service providers can be supported in general. However, it is to be investigated whether the application of many rules of consumer law could not be extended to consumers dealing with such service providers. The Commission’s advice to use trustmarks as an instrument of consumer protection is interesting, but its implementation requires further research. While the Commission is generally very supportive of the collaborative economy, its advice to collaborative platforms to take voluntary action to fight illegal content online may entail the risk of the platform losing the benefit of the hosting exemption.","PeriodicalId":142664,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Regulation that Pertains to Consumer Markets (Sub-Topic)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Other Regulation that Pertains to Consumer Markets (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2883845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

On 2 June 2016, the Commission published a Communication containing “A European agenda for the collaborative economy”. The Communication intends to provide non-binding legal guidance and policy orientation on the sustainable development of the collaborative economy. It contains a number of helpful suggestions for example as to when an individual offering services via an online platform is to be regarded as an employee. The advice to ensure a high level of consumer protection while not imposing disproportionate burdens on non-professional service providers can be supported in general. However, it is to be investigated whether the application of many rules of consumer law could not be extended to consumers dealing with such service providers. The Commission’s advice to use trustmarks as an instrument of consumer protection is interesting, but its implementation requires further research. While the Commission is generally very supportive of the collaborative economy, its advice to collaborative platforms to take voluntary action to fight illegal content online may entail the risk of the platform losing the benefit of the hosting exemption.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟委员会的欧洲合作经济议程——(也)平台和服务提供商友好?
2016年6月2日,欧盟委员会发布了一份包含“合作经济的欧洲议程”的通讯。《信息通报》旨在为协作经济的可持续发展提供无约束力的法律指导和政策导向。它包含了一些有用的建议,例如,通过在线平台提供服务的个人何时被视为雇员。关于确保高度保护消费者,同时不对非专业服务提供者造成不成比例负担的建议总体上是可以得到支持的。但是,需要调查的是,消费者法的许多规则的适用是否不能扩展到与这些服务提供者打交道的消费者。欧盟委员会关于使用信任标志作为消费者保护工具的建议很有趣,但其实施需要进一步研究。虽然欧盟委员会总体上非常支持协作经济,但其建议协作平台采取自愿行动打击在线非法内容,可能会导致平台失去托管豁免的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Property Law of Tokens Gender in the Competition Law Curriculum? 보험시장에서의 거래구조 문제와 소비자보호제도에 대한 소비자평가 연구(Consumer Evaluation of Transaction Structure and Consumer Protection System on Life and Non-Life Insurance Markets in Korea) Predatory Pricing in India Personalized Choice of Private Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1