Popularization of Korean historical and cultural studies in the 1930s

Si-Hyun Ryu
{"title":"Popularization of Korean historical and cultural studies in the 1930s","authors":"Si-Hyun Ryu","doi":"10.29004/jkmch.2023.06.105.169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to explore the topic of Korean Studies in the 1930s, we must first examine the temporal category of the 1930s. In other words, the Great Depression of 1929. The Great Depression called into question the “progress” of the Anglo-American capitalist system and raised expectations of change for socialists. More specifically, it questioned whether capitalism, which had driven the development and civilization of the West, could continue to do so. The ‘East’ was seen as a critical alternative to Western modernity. \nPrevious research on Korean Studies in the 1930s has been conducted using the keywords 1930s, but there has been little consideration of the popularization of Korean Studies in 1930s. In this article, I will look for the popularization of Korean Studies in the spread of researchers and research topics and their communication with the public. For this purpose, I will examine the magazines ≪ Jogwang≫ and ≪ Joseonmyeonginjeon≫ together. The former introduced Choson history and culture to a mass audience, while the latter engaged experts in academia to ‘popularize’ historical figures. \nIn the late 1930s, the contents of and reflected the situation of the ‘wartime regime’. Nevertheless, both media focused on popularizing knowledge and information about Korean history and culture. The difference between the two is that ‘common knowledge’ about Korean history and culture, including yadam, was excluded from ≪ Joseonmyeonginjeon≫ . This popularization of the study of Korean history and culture in the late 1930s was both continuous and disconnected from the study of Korean studies after liberation.","PeriodicalId":206821,"journal":{"name":"The Association for Korean Modern and Contemporary History","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Association for Korean Modern and Contemporary History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29004/jkmch.2023.06.105.169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to explore the topic of Korean Studies in the 1930s, we must first examine the temporal category of the 1930s. In other words, the Great Depression of 1929. The Great Depression called into question the “progress” of the Anglo-American capitalist system and raised expectations of change for socialists. More specifically, it questioned whether capitalism, which had driven the development and civilization of the West, could continue to do so. The ‘East’ was seen as a critical alternative to Western modernity. Previous research on Korean Studies in the 1930s has been conducted using the keywords 1930s, but there has been little consideration of the popularization of Korean Studies in 1930s. In this article, I will look for the popularization of Korean Studies in the spread of researchers and research topics and their communication with the public. For this purpose, I will examine the magazines ≪ Jogwang≫ and ≪ Joseonmyeonginjeon≫ together. The former introduced Choson history and culture to a mass audience, while the latter engaged experts in academia to ‘popularize’ historical figures. In the late 1930s, the contents of and reflected the situation of the ‘wartime regime’. Nevertheless, both media focused on popularizing knowledge and information about Korean history and culture. The difference between the two is that ‘common knowledge’ about Korean history and culture, including yadam, was excluded from ≪ Joseonmyeonginjeon≫ . This popularization of the study of Korean history and culture in the late 1930s was both continuous and disconnected from the study of Korean studies after liberation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
20世纪30年代韩国历史文化研究的大众化
为了探讨20世纪30年代的韩国学,我们必须首先研究20世纪30年代的时间范畴。换句话说,就是1929年的大萧条。大萧条对英美资本主义制度的“进步”提出了质疑,并提高了社会主义者对变革的期望。更具体地说,它质疑推动西方发展和文明的资本主义能否继续发挥作用。“东方”被视为西方现代性的重要替代品。以往对20世纪30年代韩国学的研究都是使用“30年代”这个关键词,但对30年代韩国学大众化的考虑却很少。在这篇文章中,我将在研究者和研究课题的传播以及与公众的交流中寻找韩国学的大众化。为此,我将一起研究《Jogwang》和《joseonminginjeon》杂志。前者向大众介绍了朝鲜的历史和文化,后者则聘请了学术界的专家来“普及”历史人物。在20世纪30年代后期,内容和反映了“战时政权”的情况。然而,两家媒体都把重点放在了普及韩国历史文化知识和信息上。两者的不同之处在于,关于韩国历史和文化的“常识”,包括山竹,被排除在《朝鲜明仁传》之外。20世纪30年代末的韩国历史文化研究大众化,与光复后的韩国学研究既有连续性,又有断续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Role and Change of the Employment Agency in the Japanese colonial era The Current Status of Korean Studies in France and the Revitalization of Korean Independence Movement Trends and Achievements of Korean Independence Movement History Research in Chinese Academia(1992~2021) Popularization of Korean historical and cultural studies in the 1930s Sinheung Military Academy as Seen from the Data Collection of the Japanese Diplomatic Archives: Bright and Darkness of Secret Intelligence Reports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1