Comparison analysis of calculation results for target scattering cross section based on feature selective validation

Yonghu Zeng, Lei Gao, Liandong Wang, Jinliang Li
{"title":"Comparison analysis of calculation results for target scattering cross section based on feature selective validation","authors":"Yonghu Zeng, Lei Gao, Liandong Wang, Jinliang Li","doi":"10.1109/APEMC.2016.7522968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are three kinds of typical electromagnetic calculation methods, i.e., high frequency asymptotic method, differential equation method and the integral equation method, which are represented by physical optics (PO) method, finite element method (FEM) and moment method (MoM), respectively. Feature selective validation method was proposed by IEEE EMC Association 1597.2 standard in 2011. In this paper, feature selective validation method is used according to the aforementioned three methods to calculate the radar cross section (RCS) of the reduced size Brahmos missile model in two different frequencies. The differences of the results are analyzed. Results show that the similarity between the results of using PO method and MoM is poor, especially in the lower frequency. However, the results of using FEM and MoM are quite similar. Besides, the similarity does not change with the frequency.","PeriodicalId":358257,"journal":{"name":"2016 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (APEMC)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (APEMC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APEMC.2016.7522968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There are three kinds of typical electromagnetic calculation methods, i.e., high frequency asymptotic method, differential equation method and the integral equation method, which are represented by physical optics (PO) method, finite element method (FEM) and moment method (MoM), respectively. Feature selective validation method was proposed by IEEE EMC Association 1597.2 standard in 2011. In this paper, feature selective validation method is used according to the aforementioned three methods to calculate the radar cross section (RCS) of the reduced size Brahmos missile model in two different frequencies. The differences of the results are analyzed. Results show that the similarity between the results of using PO method and MoM is poor, especially in the lower frequency. However, the results of using FEM and MoM are quite similar. Besides, the similarity does not change with the frequency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于特征选择验证的目标散射截面计算结果对比分析
典型的电磁计算方法有三种,即高频渐近法、微分方程法和积分方程法,分别以物理光学法(PO)、有限元法(FEM)和矩量法(MoM)为代表。特征选择验证方法是2011年IEEE EMC协会1597.2标准提出的。本文根据上述三种方法,采用特征选择验证方法计算缩小尺寸布拉莫斯导弹模型在两种不同频率下的雷达截面(RCS)。分析了结果的差异。结果表明,PO法与MoM法的相似度较差,特别是在低频处。然而,用有限元法和有限元法计算的结果非常相似。此外,相似度不随频率的变化而变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improved hybrid leapfrog ADI-FDTD method for simulating complex electromagnetic environment effects (E3) on a warship with multi-wire antennas SI architecture optimized high speed serial design for PCB cost saving Fault analysis and protection strategy on Contactless Power Transfer system for electric vehicle A U-shaped slot antenna for WLAN and WiMAX applications Time-domain measurement technique to analyze cyclic short-time interference in power supply networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1