Breakout

D. Lopes, Bence Nanay, Nick Riggle
{"title":"Breakout","authors":"D. Lopes, Bence Nanay, Nick Riggle","doi":"10.5749/j.ctv6zd95b.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three accounts of why aesthetic life matters—the achievement account, the individuality-in-community account, and the venture account—have different implications. Some of their implications touch on hot-button issues. Aesthetic life involves disagreement. What is its point? Many believe that aesthetic reactions are subjective. In what sense is that true, if it is true? Can we escape ethnocentrism in our thinking about aesthetic engagement? Why do aesthetic practices change as rapidly as they do? Are they fads? Is rapid change a problem? How should we respond to the ideological function of aesthetic life, especially in discriminatory and damaging ideals of bodily beauty?","PeriodicalId":319598,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Life and Why It Matters","volume":"30 19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Life and Why It Matters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctv6zd95b.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Three accounts of why aesthetic life matters—the achievement account, the individuality-in-community account, and the venture account—have different implications. Some of their implications touch on hot-button issues. Aesthetic life involves disagreement. What is its point? Many believe that aesthetic reactions are subjective. In what sense is that true, if it is true? Can we escape ethnocentrism in our thinking about aesthetic engagement? Why do aesthetic practices change as rapidly as they do? Are they fads? Is rapid change a problem? How should we respond to the ideological function of aesthetic life, especially in discriminatory and damaging ideals of bodily beauty?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
突破
关于审美生活为什么重要的三种说法——成就说、社区中的个性说和冒险说——有着不同的含义。他们的一些暗示触及了热点问题。审美生活包含分歧。它的意义是什么?许多人认为审美反应是主观的。如果这是真的,在什么意义上这是真的?我们能在审美参与的思考中摆脱种族中心主义吗?为什么审美实践的变化如此之快?它们是时尚吗?快速变化是个问题吗?我们应该如何回应审美生活的意识形态功能,特别是对身体美的歧视性和破坏性理想?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Getting into It Breakout Unlocking Experience Aesthetic Lives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1