Comparative analysis of upstream petroleum fiscal systems of Pakistan, Thailand and other countries with medium ranked oil reserves

S. Zahidi
{"title":"Comparative analysis of upstream petroleum fiscal systems of Pakistan, Thailand and other countries with medium ranked oil reserves","authors":"S. Zahidi","doi":"10.1109/ESD.2010.5598867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Governments and Investors are both interested in the petroleum fiscal systems operating in various countries. Governments aim to attract investors, whereas investors are continually searching for markets which provide the rewards commensurate with the risk they will take. Using fiscal tools, governments can make their upstream petroleum regimes more attractive to investors, by providing greater rewards. Therefore, fiscal tools are important for the management and best exploitation of national oil resources. Although many factors can influence attractiveness of a particular upstream petroleum regime, such as the individual geological attractiveness of a particular prospect, costs of exploration and production or the risk profile of a country or concession, yet, by holding all such factors constant, a model has been built that allows the comparison of various countries in terms of fiscal systems only. The research undertaken compares the current upstream petroleum fiscal systems of countries with closely similar oil reserves to those of Pakistan. Turkey, Cameroon, Congo, and Thailand are the randomly selected countries; however any country with similarly ranked oil reserves could have been selected for comparison. Take Statistics have been used to determine the global competitiveness of upstream petroleum fiscal systems of the five countries.","PeriodicalId":272782,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Energy and Sustainable Development: Issues and Strategies (ESD 2010)","volume":"266 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Energy and Sustainable Development: Issues and Strategies (ESD 2010)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESD.2010.5598867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Governments and Investors are both interested in the petroleum fiscal systems operating in various countries. Governments aim to attract investors, whereas investors are continually searching for markets which provide the rewards commensurate with the risk they will take. Using fiscal tools, governments can make their upstream petroleum regimes more attractive to investors, by providing greater rewards. Therefore, fiscal tools are important for the management and best exploitation of national oil resources. Although many factors can influence attractiveness of a particular upstream petroleum regime, such as the individual geological attractiveness of a particular prospect, costs of exploration and production or the risk profile of a country or concession, yet, by holding all such factors constant, a model has been built that allows the comparison of various countries in terms of fiscal systems only. The research undertaken compares the current upstream petroleum fiscal systems of countries with closely similar oil reserves to those of Pakistan. Turkey, Cameroon, Congo, and Thailand are the randomly selected countries; however any country with similarly ranked oil reserves could have been selected for comparison. Take Statistics have been used to determine the global competitiveness of upstream petroleum fiscal systems of the five countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴基斯坦、泰国等中等石油储量国家上游石油财政制度比较分析
各国政府和投资者都对各国的石油财政制度感兴趣。政府的目标是吸引投资者,而投资者则不断寻找能够提供与其所承担风险相称的回报的市场。利用财政工具,政府可以通过提供更高的回报,使其上游石油制度对投资者更具吸引力。因此,财政工具对国家石油资源的管理和最佳开发至关重要。虽然许多因素可以影响特定上游石油制度的吸引力,例如特定勘探区的个别地质吸引力、勘探和生产成本或一个国家或特许权的风险概况,但是,通过保持所有这些因素不变,已经建立了一个模型,仅允许在财政制度方面对各国进行比较。所进行的研究比较了石油储量与巴基斯坦非常相似的国家目前的上游石油财政制度。土耳其、喀麦隆、刚果和泰国是随机选择的国家;然而,任何石油储量排名相似的国家都可以被选中进行比较。采用统计数据来确定五国上游石油财政体系的全球竞争力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Result of road lighting energy saving project implementation through the use of public private partnership scheme Experimental study on heat transfer and pressure drop in a channel with triangular V-ribs Shihmen sediment prevention diversion tunnel planning and design Potential of thermoelectric power from bagasse by sugar mills of Pakistan Multi-scenarios of effective demand side management in Navanakorn industrial promotion zone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1