Introducing a test suite similarity metric for event sequence-based test cases

Penelope A. Brooks, A. Memon
{"title":"Introducing a test suite similarity metric for event sequence-based test cases","authors":"Penelope A. Brooks, A. Memon","doi":"10.1109/ICSM.2009.5306305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most of today's event driven software (EDS) systems are tested using test cases that are carefully constructed as sequences of events; they test the execution of an event in the context of its preceding events. Because sizes of these test suites can be extremely large, researchers have developed techniques, such as reduction and minimization, to obtain test suites that are “similar” to the original test suite, but smaller. Existing similarity metrics mostly use code coverage; they do not consider the contextual relationships between events. Consequently, reduction based on such metrics may eliminate desirable test cases. In this paper, we present a new parameterized metric, CONTeSSi(n) which uses the context of n preceding events in test cases to develop a new context-aware notion of test suite similarity for EDS. This metric is defined and evaluated by comparing four test suites for each of four open source applications. Our results show that CONT eSSi(n) is a better indicator of the similarity of EDS test suites than existing metrics.","PeriodicalId":247441,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2009.5306305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Most of today's event driven software (EDS) systems are tested using test cases that are carefully constructed as sequences of events; they test the execution of an event in the context of its preceding events. Because sizes of these test suites can be extremely large, researchers have developed techniques, such as reduction and minimization, to obtain test suites that are “similar” to the original test suite, but smaller. Existing similarity metrics mostly use code coverage; they do not consider the contextual relationships between events. Consequently, reduction based on such metrics may eliminate desirable test cases. In this paper, we present a new parameterized metric, CONTeSSi(n) which uses the context of n preceding events in test cases to develop a new context-aware notion of test suite similarity for EDS. This metric is defined and evaluated by comparing four test suites for each of four open source applications. Our results show that CONT eSSi(n) is a better indicator of the similarity of EDS test suites than existing metrics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为基于事件序列的测试用例引入测试套件相似性度量
今天的大多数事件驱动软件(EDS)系统都是使用仔细构建为事件序列的测试用例进行测试的;它们在前一个事件的上下文中测试事件的执行情况。由于这些测试套件的大小可能非常大,研究人员已经开发了一些技术,例如减少和最小化,以获得与原始测试套件“相似”但更小的测试套件。现有的相似性度量主要使用代码覆盖率;他们不考虑事件之间的上下文关系。因此,基于这些度量的缩减可能会消除理想的测试用例。在本文中,我们提出了一个新的参数化度量,CONTeSSi(n),它使用测试用例中n个先前事件的上下文来为EDS开发一个新的上下文感知的测试套件相似性概念。这个度量是通过比较四个开源应用程序的四个测试套件来定义和评估的。我们的结果表明,CONT eSSi(n)是EDS测试套件相似性的一个比现有指标更好的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interactive views for analyzing problem reports Recovering design rationale from email repositories Maintenance, or the 3rd dimension of eXtreme model-driven design What's hot and what's not: Windowed developer topic analysis On predicting the time taken to correct bug reports in open source projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1